Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AJTheMan

(288 posts)
11. It's Simple Really
Fri Jun 1, 2012, 11:58 PM
Jun 2012

I believe that parents should have the option on how their children should be schooled. The parents know what will work for their kids and what won't. Some of these kids live in public school districts where the school has received bad grades and has a high dropout rate. If their parents want to give their kids an alternative to the failing public school and the only thing stopping them from doing so is income, then I believe the government should absolutely subsidize that student's tuition. The actions taken by the governor are about two things. Number one, is giving control of education back to the parents. In years past, only the highly affluent would be able to attend prestigious private schools. The minorities, the poor, the under privileged were forced to go to the public school. If the public school is failing and has a high dropout rate and the teachers are down right crappy, then the student would still have to go, knowing that he or she faces an uphill battle. Now that this piece of legislation has been enacted, parents have a few more options. If they feel like the public school in their area will not properly prepare their child for the future, they now have the opportunity to seek alternatives, regardless of income. For the first time, many poor to middle class parents will have a choice in how their children are to be educated. Trust me, I live near Shreveport, in Caddo Parish, where 19 schools have failing grades. If we can help just one student by subsidizing their education at a better private school, then this program is a success.

The second core issue with this piece of legislation is putting teachers on the same playing field as every one else in life. You know, how, in your job, if you constantly screw up, you're going to get fired? Well, it motivates you to do your job properly so that you don't lose your job. You keep your job, the task at hand is done successfully, and the company prospers as a whole. What if, however, your company told you that no matter what you do, save something outright lewd or illegal, nothing you could do could get you fired. What results, in that situation? Complacency. Apathy. Screw ups. You can fail at the job all you want and no matter how bad you are at it, you cannot get fired. Well, for many years, this was the case in our class rooms. Now I'm not saying that all tenured teachers are bad. I knew plenty of great teachers who were tenured. I also knew quite a few who were just awful but because they were tenured, the administration couldn't do a thing about it. I had a teacher freshman year who failed 66% of her students. And this was at a school that consistently gets ranked as one of the best in the parish. My family asked the administration if something could be done but alas, nothing could be done. She was tenured and they just had to wait for her to retire. The second issue here is that teachers, like every other profession in the planet, should be held accountable for their work. If they consistently fail students and are given bad performance reviews, then their jobs may be in jeopardy. Just like you or me. If they are consistently shown to educate students in a good manner, then they can be promoted with salary increases. This idea that your career revolves around how you perform is not all that new. Look in any other sector other than teaching and you see it in place. The bad employee gets fired, the good one gets promoted.

Now to your points. For most of my Freshman and Sophomore year, I went to a school called Evangel Christian Academy. Every Tuesday we had Chapel, where the leaders of the school would talk about God and sing his praises. (I was and still am atheist in my thinking, so this didn't phase me too much) Beyond that, however, school was exactly like public school. We learned the same math as everyone else. We learned the same science as everyone else. Believe it or not, we had to learn about the way life evolved and our ultimate origins. We learned literature such as Shakespeare and other great writers. The curriculum, for the most part, was nearly the same as at public school. We didn't learn much about the big bang but that's mostly because the big bang is covered in our eighth grade year here in Louisiana. My last two years of High School went to my local public school. There weren't very many differences, save the fact that the teachers at private school are a little more forgiving whenever it comes to test scores.

Now there may be a school that has no windows or may seem like a bunker. The best part of this legislation is that if the parents are offended by the religious elements, or the bunker like appearance of the school, they can decide to take their business elsewhere. Maybe a different private school or even a different public school.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

this is a long, comprehensive article and it is chilling cali Jun 2012 #1
Bookingmarking so I can read when I have more time. Jazzgirl Jun 2012 #2
Be sure not to miss the school that doesn't teach evolution malthaussen Jun 2012 #3
not to mention the bunker like building with no windows cali Jun 2012 #4
Now that's some real scary shit! Jazzgirl Jun 2012 #5
How about a schoolroom that's a fallout shelter? malthaussen Jun 2012 #6
a nightmare d_r Jun 2012 #7
Taking public money for that? Someone needs to stomp on that, quick. WriteWrong Jun 2012 #8
I support Governor Jindal's actions in this case AJTheMan Jun 2012 #9
why? did you read the article? cali Jun 2012 #10
It's Simple Really AJTheMan Jun 2012 #11
Sorry, but it's ridiculous to state that if one student cali Jun 2012 #13
I did read the article. What makes you think the program will hurt students 10:1? AJTheMan Jun 2012 #16
If you read the article, you should know that many of these schools cali Jun 2012 #17
Well, you're correct, that is one author's viewpoint. Others would disagree. AJTheMan Jun 2012 #20
Public monies should not be used to fund religious schools. Period. HiPointDem Jun 2012 #23
You can't dictate to teachers like they work on an assembly line. Selatius Jun 2012 #14
Many of our schools are desperately over crowded and there are not that many vouchers available. AJTheMan Jun 2012 #18
That's a problem of overcrowding, and that's far easier to solve than this complex bill. Selatius Jun 2012 #21
Baloney. Making public schools disappear is precisely what this initiative is about. HiPointDem Jun 2012 #24
RW bullshit. Enjoy yojur short stay. Odin2005 Jun 2012 #26
A windowless school is nothing new. ChazII Jun 2012 #12
I taught at a charter school for one week and quit. kemah Jun 2012 #15
This is as good a time as any to note that Booby Jindal has an Ivy League degree KamaAina Jun 2012 #19
wow. thanks. I didn't know that he had a degree in biology. cali Jun 2012 #22
I've always wondered if jindal's family isn't related to these jindals: HiPointDem Jun 2012 #25
He should have his degree revoked. Odin2005 Jun 2012 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Yikes: Louisiana's bold ...»Reply #11