Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Does that mean 2/3 can propose amendments - not actually ratify them? That is what is sounds like. patricia92243 Jan 2016 #1
good question grasswire Jan 2016 #2
Ratification must be by 3/4 of the states n/t SickOfTheOnePct Jan 2016 #4
So we only need 13 holdouts if this happens. KamaAina Jan 2016 #6
12 holdouts SickOfTheOnePct Jan 2016 #7
No, if they get 38, they win KamaAina Jan 2016 #8
Sorry, my bad! SickOfTheOnePct Jan 2016 #9
The convention can add, delete, modofy, amend, etc 1939 Jan 2016 #5
Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't O'Malley want a constitutional convention Gregorian Jan 2016 #3
Calling a constitutional convention will bring about civil war. N/t roamer65 Jan 2016 #10
That's a little extreme, don't you think? n/t SickOfTheOnePct Jan 2016 #11
I don't think so...a far-right, Teabagger "Constitution"...? First Speaker Jan 2016 #13
With open carry then, if you are in violation of a new law, like walking with a cola and skittles, DhhD Jan 2016 #16
I wouldn't care. I'd literally rather be dead than live under their "Constitution" First Speaker Jan 2016 #19
What a can of worms this would be CanonRay Jan 2016 #12
K&R emsimon33 Jan 2016 #14
o.0 creepy. nt retrowire Jan 2016 #15
Amendments still must be ratified by the states. Xithras Jan 2016 #17
Or the right to seceed from the Union. Hoppy Jan 2016 #18
Conservatives are making the federal govt obsolete. SleeplessinSoCal Jan 2016 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WARNING from Robert Reich...»Reply #9