Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Danish teen fought off her attacker - now she'll face fine [View all]beevul
(12,194 posts)241. Not once have you provided anything to back up your assertions.
Bullshit
Not once have you provided anything to back up your assertions during your exchange with me. Not a single time.
Free hint: "bullshit" doesn't qualify.
Yeah it's all about the right of an individual to protect themselves.
Any society which does not allow its citizens reasonable tools to protect themselves, is as sick as the thinking that leads to such a society, which is to say disturbingly, disgustingly sick.
The same argument that has millions of guns pouring across the nation year on year. Except you don't want to own that do you...
I own that competely. I support private individual gun ownership. It happens to be a right in this country, not a privilege or a boon granted by authority. As it should be. Your nation (IIRC) and what is now mine had a little disagreement about such philosophical differences a couple hundred years ago. You are, I expect, aware of how that turned out.
..., you want this to be about a single case of a girl who managed to fight off a rapists.
The OP is about a girl who managed to fight off a rapist. You're trying to make this about guns.
Fuck the societal implications of what you're supporting, fuck the evidence of a society that doesn't follow your bullshit and which as a result is far safer and happier.
You've provided no such evidence. You simply assert that it exists, and we should take your word that it exists and indicates what you insinuate it does. That's not how debate works, at least on this side of the pond.
And you know what else? As far as I'm concerned, FUCK any society which does not allow its citizens reasonable tools for self defense. Is that perfectly crystal clear enough for you?
The rape victim in the OP would not have been safer or happier with out the pepper spray, and you know what, you can't refute that. Its not debatable. The best you can do, is continue to post factual devoid substance free irrelevant diatribes claiming that society is more important, as you have. Pretty much everyone in this thread sees it too.
No, you have your point to prove, and you're going to fight it to the end, and anyone who calls you on that must be a rape apologist.
Not quite. Not even close. The point has already been proven. You can ignore that, and pretend to your hearts content that such isn't the case, but your denial can't make the facts disappear.
Also, I have to question your attempt to put your words into my mouth. I never used the words "rape apologist". I simply said that when it comes to the individual vs society, you side with society, even when the individual is a rape victim. That's not an opinion, that's a fact. All it takes is a brief perusal of this thread, which everyone is entirely free to do for themselves, to see it. It sticks out like a sore thumb. That it makes you uncomfortable when people point it out, would make a thinking person re-examine their beliefs. But not you, you're a true believer. If you're hearing the words "rape apologist" where those words aren't used, its possible however unlikely, that your conscience is talking to you, but I expect its just you trying to defend the indefensible.
Finally, you present zero evidence to support your claims assertions and insinuations. You refuse to address anything others say to you. Basically you just keep posting non-sequiturs strawmen and misrepresentations. Maybe that constitutes debate in your circles, but it doesn't on DU.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
277 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If the law obligates her to be defenseless to the point of being violently rape the law is unjust.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#2
If she can't fight off her attacker under her own power whose fault is that?
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#17
If the law obligates someone to remain defenseless when confronted by a predator the is unjust.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#22
The logical destination of that argument is that possession and carry of all weapons should be legal
Kentonio
Jan 2016
#24
Please show me one place where it is legal to carry a weapon in the commission of a crime.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#38
In Europe carrying most weapons is illegal. You don't need to catch someone in the act.
Kentonio
Jan 2016
#43
Well, her assailant was unarmed so, yes, I suppose you could say there is less weapon crime.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#50
The western European countries are strongly against public carrying of weapons in public
Kentonio
Jan 2016
#54
"The expectation in Europe is that society is kept safe by thorough and competent law enforcement"
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#59
I support the right to self defense. Self defense trumps opinions and hurt feelings.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#105
The people seem quite agreeable. It's the morally bankrupt government that is the issue.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#111
We just got done commemorating Rev. King's birthday because he taught us -- yet again --
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#124
It is not an unjust law, and frankly I finding you using King here to be quite inappropriate.
Kentonio
Jan 2016
#127
This is why there is such a furor in Europe over immigration. It's two years in Germany also.
Yo_Mama
Jan 2016
#99
Yes, I would. I am a woman. Of the women I've known who have been raped, the only
Yo_Mama
Jan 2016
#108
That's still not nearly enough. Especially if it was particularly violent.
smirkymonkey
Jan 2016
#92
Europe base their criminal justice systems more around rehabilitation than punishment.
Kentonio
Jan 2016
#94
This is a stupid argument, IMO. If gangs of criminals or individuals with Uzis were
Yo_Mama
Jan 2016
#65
"Yes, women who are under credible threat of rape should be allowed to carry defensive weaponry"
Kentonio
Jan 2016
#82
She is a woman with a credible threat and still you want her prosecuted.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#90
I don't want her to be prosecuted, its not something that gives me any pleasure or happiness
Kentonio
Jan 2016
#93
People who use it in assaults or robberies can be prosecuted for using it inappropriately.
pnwmom
Jan 2016
#144
It shouldn't be banned for defensive purposes. It's insane for any of our states
pnwmom
Jan 2016
#180
Laws regarding pepper spray vary and there are many types and strengths of pepper spray
azurnoir
Jan 2016
#5
would you restrict the sale to women only? what's to stop an assailant from purchasing it and using
azurnoir
Jan 2016
#20
"what's to stop an assailant from purchasing it and using it on a victim"
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#23
So what of her age? Does her age somehow obligate her to remain defenseless?
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#28
Taking a gun from an assailant is quite a bit different from possessing a gun yourself
azurnoir
Jan 2016
#32
The authorities failed to protect. The people are not obligated to remain defenseless.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#39
No person who defends themelves from a criminal predaor should also have to
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#44
Well, she wouldn't if I had anything to say about it, and if she does get fined,
Yo_Mama
Jan 2016
#102
You probably don't want to compare sexual equality between the US and Denmark..
Kentonio
Jan 2016
#10
ah yaaa Sweden, Norway, the UK , Iceland are all known for their misogyny-rrrright
azurnoir
Jan 2016
#13
Are you saying discussing rape statistics is xenophobia just because the statistics are for another
PersonNumber503602
Jan 2016
#133
Looks to me like you are blaming much of it on the migrants. And what statistics are in your post?
A Simple Game
Jan 2016
#139
Well yeah they are. Some of the highest sexual assault rates in the industrialized world
Recursion
Jan 2016
#80
Forget it. Let me take a wild guess. Everyone who is defending this decision is male.
smirkymonkey
Jan 2016
#89
I'm writing this from Europe where I'm currently living, so I feel quite qualified to do so.
Kentonio
Jan 2016
#225
And what is this, "Women should appeal to their government to change the law" crap?
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#15
Pardon not granted as I am disinclined to seek favor with those having obvious control issues.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#49
Huh. Danes sound like they are taking lessons from ISIS on how to treat women. n/t
jtuck004
Jan 2016
#29
lol. That will comfort her as she pays a fine for having to use pepper spray on a creep. I'll
jtuck004
Jan 2016
#141
Lol. Sure, slavery and subjugation and assault mean equality, the right to be attacked
jtuck004
Jan 2016
#149
Because obviously we make laws based on individual outlier cases like this one..
Kentonio
Jan 2016
#156
Remind me of the single gun crime incident which caused everyone to suddenly try and regulate
Kentonio
Jan 2016
#161
A teenage girl has a duty to be raped because you fear her pepper spray will lead to another SH?
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#197
When the decision came between the law or stopping a rapist you chose the law as higher importance.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#208
It's not crap if it's what you've been saying the entire thread: law > rape victims
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#213
Not bullshit at all-you've produced no evidence. What you promote is the ethos of Inspector Javert
friendly_iconoclast
Jan 2016
#240
I just wanted to note that pepper spray is hardly banned anywhere in the USA,
branford
Jan 2016
#277
In some twisted way you think assaulting defenseless women represents equality.
jtuck004
Jan 2016
#162
You really think gender equality has fuck-all to do with defending yourself from a rape?
NickB79
Jan 2016
#229
The attacker was described as an "English-speaking man in dark clothing".
surrealAmerican
Jan 2016
#125
Not really. English, while not the official language, is the most common second language...
Lancero
Jan 2016
#168
I have a feeling that they are mostly just anti-self defense when it comes to women.
smirkymonkey
Jan 2016
#146
Unreal. It seems to me, from reading the comments of Europeans in both the
smirkymonkey
Jan 2016
#183
Yes, exactly, but it seems like the Governments and LEO's haven't quite caught up yet with the
smirkymonkey
Jan 2016
#185
The law enforcement / self-defense far leftward tilt is separate from and predates
branford
Jan 2016
#188
It would appear that a number of DUers regard Inspector Javert as a role model...
friendly_iconoclast
Jan 2016
#233
+10^10. The authoritarian nature of the 'self-defense prohibitionists' has been revealed
friendly_iconoclast
Jan 2016
#232
Because the tool which was used for self-defense is entirely irrelevant to the discussion.
redgreenandblue
Jan 2016
#245
The tool is relevant because it demonstrates that some self-proclaimed liberals
branford
Jan 2016
#249
Well they shouldn't fine her but if they do maybe people will chip in to pay it and
yellowcanine
Jan 2016
#222