Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: When will the lower middle class ( especially white men) realize that the rich play them? [View all]lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)36. People generally view politics through a group identity lens.
So long as we liberals continue to use the phrase "white male" as a pejorative, it's unlikely to change.
This thread is an excellent example of the kind of condescension that the normal person would find repellent.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2008/05/obama_and_orwell.html
Orwell also rails against the condescension many on the left display toward those they profess to care most about. Describing a gathering of leftists in London, he says, "every person there, male and female, bore the worst stigmata of sniffish middle-class superiority. If a real working man, a miner dirty from the pit, for instance, had suddenly walked into their midst, they would have been embarrassed, angry and disgusted; some, I should think, would have fled holding their noses."...
The perennial struggle of Democratic contenders to appeal to ordinary Americans seems very much of a piece with Orwell's sharp descriptions. Election after election, Democrats argue that once Joe and Jane Sixpack fully grasp the wisdom of the latest six-point college-loan program, or of an 800-page health-care scheme, they will come to wave the Democratic banner. And, sometimes, these voters do just thatprovided that the candidate in question has demonstrated a sense that he or she is not treating them as the subject of an anthropological study. Bill Clinton had a full steamer trunk of domestic programs; he also was a product of Georgetown, Oxford, and Yale Law School. But his 18 years in the vineyards of Arkansas politics gave him the tools to compete for support on a more visceral level. Then there were Clinton's obvious tastes for earthly pleasuresfrom Big Macs to more intimate diversionswhich made it very hard to label him as an aloof elitist.
The perennial struggle of Democratic contenders to appeal to ordinary Americans seems very much of a piece with Orwell's sharp descriptions. Election after election, Democrats argue that once Joe and Jane Sixpack fully grasp the wisdom of the latest six-point college-loan program, or of an 800-page health-care scheme, they will come to wave the Democratic banner. And, sometimes, these voters do just thatprovided that the candidate in question has demonstrated a sense that he or she is not treating them as the subject of an anthropological study. Bill Clinton had a full steamer trunk of domestic programs; he also was a product of Georgetown, Oxford, and Yale Law School. But his 18 years in the vineyards of Arkansas politics gave him the tools to compete for support on a more visceral level. Then there were Clinton's obvious tastes for earthly pleasuresfrom Big Macs to more intimate diversionswhich made it very hard to label him as an aloof elitist.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
When will the lower middle class ( especially white men) realize that the rich play them? [View all]
samrock
Jun 2012
OP
I've always said sports are the training ground for soldiers and it's blind soldiering
valerief
Jun 2012
#6
Interestingly enough (and humorous in a dark-humor sort of way), men
coalition_unwilling
Jun 2012
#20
So if this brainwashing were magically removed, what would people do for entertainment?
RZM
Jun 2012
#63
You just can't convince them that the real problem is income distribution to the top.
brewens
Jun 2012
#4
When they get over their anger, hatred and fear of women and minorities.
Liberal_Stalwart71
Jun 2012
#12
LMAO (but also crying inside). If you can plant 'Blazing Saddles' on your
coalition_unwilling
Jun 2012
#21
One Aunt Thinks Dems Want To Kill Babies The Other Thinks Dems Want To Have Babies On Her Dime
HangOnKids
Jun 2012
#24
The Repigs should only receive 1% of the vote, the Dems 10% and Democratic
coalition_unwilling
Jun 2012
#19
Plantation owners named Washington, Jefferson, Rutledge, Longstreet, Byrd, etc...
Tom Ripley
Jun 2012
#61
Oh, man. HST never grows old. Truth in advertising: I attended high school
coalition_unwilling
Jun 2012
#31
Maybe they do, or maybe most do realize this. Our Democratic leaders would get more votes if
AnotherMcIntosh
Jun 2012
#34
+1. It's really tiresome to see the canard "lower-class white men are stupid" being pushed.
HiPointDem
Jun 2012
#55
Same thing with the religious right. They are stooges,fed a few crumbs by those who they support.
ladjf
Jun 2012
#38
The problem is they have the heads up their asses. LOL They is where you got to pull them
southernyankeebelle
Jun 2012
#46
When will millions (now billions) of dollars of negative ads cease to have an effect?
Stargleamer
Jun 2012
#50
When all the televisions spontaneously melt and the the broadcast infrastructure is swallowed
Egalitarian Thug
Jun 2012
#57
About an hour after it is too late to do a damn thing about it short of massive bloodshed.
TheKentuckian
Jun 2012
#58