Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Top official negotiating the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) has RESIGNED over bribery charges [View all]cascadiance
(19,537 posts)66. The problem is that so many of the crimes had "deals" cut that exchanged criminal liability...
... for fines, where the amount of the fines with lack of any criminal prosecution of the offenders that would have happened in the Savings and Loan crisis had most of these banks just write off these fines as a cost of doing business, and many of them would continue to just break the law without fear of having anyone going to jail. And of course a lot of cases now have the statue of limitations expired since they let these guys go, so they're getting off scott free. Read more here.
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/09/how-wall-streets-bankers-stayed-out-of-jail/399368/
...
n May 27, in her first major prosecutorial act as the new U.S. attorney general, Loretta Lynch unsealed a 47-count indictment against nine FIFA officials and another five corporate executives. She was passionate about their wrongdoing. The indictment alleges corruption that is rampant, systemic, and deep-rooted both abroad and here in the United States, she said. Todays action makes clear that this Department of Justice intends to end any such corrupt practices, to root out misconduct, and to bring wrongdoers to justice.
Lost in the hoopla surrounding the event was a depressing fact. Lynch and her predecessor, Eric Holder, appear to have turned the page on a more relevant vein of wrongdoing: the profligate and dishonest behavior of Wall Street bankers, traders, and executives in the years leading up to the 2008 financial crisis. How we arrived at a place where Wall Street misdeeds go virtually unpunished while soccer executives in Switzerland get arrested is murky at best. But the legal window for punishing Wall Street bankers for fraudulent actions that contributed to the 2008 crash has just about closed. It seems an apt time to ask: In the biggest picture, what justice has been achieved?
Since 2009, 49 financial institutions have paid various government entities and private plaintiffs nearly $190 billion in fines and settlements, according to an analysis by the investment bank Keefe, Bruyette & Woods. That may seem like a big number, but the money has come from shareholders, not individual bankers. (Settlements were levied on corporations, not specific employees, and paid out as corporate expensesin some cases, tax-deductible ones.) In early 2014, just weeks after Jamie Dimon, the CEO of JPMorgan Chase, settled out of court with the Justice Department, the banks board of directors gave him a 74 percent raise, bringing his salary to $20 million.
The more meaningful number is how many Wall Street executives have gone to jail for playing a part in the crisis. That number is one. (Kareem Serageldin, a senior trader at Credit Suisse, is serving a 30-month sentence for inflating the value of mortgage bonds in his trading portfolio, allowing them to appear more valuable than they really were.) By way of contrast, following the savings-and-loan crisis of the 1980s, more than 1,000 bankers of all stripes were jailed for their transgressions.
...
n May 27, in her first major prosecutorial act as the new U.S. attorney general, Loretta Lynch unsealed a 47-count indictment against nine FIFA officials and another five corporate executives. She was passionate about their wrongdoing. The indictment alleges corruption that is rampant, systemic, and deep-rooted both abroad and here in the United States, she said. Todays action makes clear that this Department of Justice intends to end any such corrupt practices, to root out misconduct, and to bring wrongdoers to justice.
Lost in the hoopla surrounding the event was a depressing fact. Lynch and her predecessor, Eric Holder, appear to have turned the page on a more relevant vein of wrongdoing: the profligate and dishonest behavior of Wall Street bankers, traders, and executives in the years leading up to the 2008 financial crisis. How we arrived at a place where Wall Street misdeeds go virtually unpunished while soccer executives in Switzerland get arrested is murky at best. But the legal window for punishing Wall Street bankers for fraudulent actions that contributed to the 2008 crash has just about closed. It seems an apt time to ask: In the biggest picture, what justice has been achieved?
Since 2009, 49 financial institutions have paid various government entities and private plaintiffs nearly $190 billion in fines and settlements, according to an analysis by the investment bank Keefe, Bruyette & Woods. That may seem like a big number, but the money has come from shareholders, not individual bankers. (Settlements were levied on corporations, not specific employees, and paid out as corporate expensesin some cases, tax-deductible ones.) In early 2014, just weeks after Jamie Dimon, the CEO of JPMorgan Chase, settled out of court with the Justice Department, the banks board of directors gave him a 74 percent raise, bringing his salary to $20 million.
The more meaningful number is how many Wall Street executives have gone to jail for playing a part in the crisis. That number is one. (Kareem Serageldin, a senior trader at Credit Suisse, is serving a 30-month sentence for inflating the value of mortgage bonds in his trading portfolio, allowing them to appear more valuable than they really were.) By way of contrast, following the savings-and-loan crisis of the 1980s, more than 1,000 bankers of all stripes were jailed for their transgressions.
...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
76 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Top official negotiating the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) has RESIGNED over bribery charges [View all]
Triana
Jan 2016
OP
Good! This sham corporate-driven rip-off of American workers needs to die & go away. nt
99th_Monkey
Jan 2016
#1
Her “opposition” is tepid at best. Here’s what she said before she was against it
dorkzilla
Jan 2016
#9
You probably should have included that the negotiator in question was a part of the
1StrongBlackMan
Jan 2016
#2
How long have you been here? Don't you know Obama is an Establishment con man -- Keystone, TPP,
Hoyt
Jan 2016
#17
I guess though I criticize him on TPP, my praise for Obama on the Iran deal doesn't fit the bashing.
cascadiance
Jan 2016
#42
Okay. You don't like many of his policies, particularly his trade policies; but, tell me ...
1StrongBlackMan
Jan 2016
#47
There's been a lot of outright fraud, like banks falsifying loan documents, etc. for foreclosures
cascadiance
Jan 2016
#53
The problem is that so many of the crimes had "deals" cut that exchanged criminal liability...
cascadiance
Jan 2016
#66
It's not whether those that didn't read the piece thought the bribed negotiator was an American ...
1StrongBlackMan
Jan 2016
#75
Toward the end: "It's not clear yet whether the bribe was related to the TPP itself..."
NurseJackie
Jan 2016
#10
Wish we had a justice department that would actually prosecute bums like this in our country!
cascadiance
Jan 2016
#3
Rich people get a better bang for their buck by corrupting the gatekeepers and keyholders rather
GoneFishin
Jan 2016
#43
I pray this begins the death spiral of TPP and other treasonous "trade" agreements; nafta, cafta,
Dont call me Shirley
Jan 2016
#19
One need only look on the rosters of the secret tpp meetings to discover the treasonous criminals.
Dont call me Shirley
Jan 2016
#34
He should have taken his bribes the legal way like Michael Froman did. Exit bonuses.
pa28
Jan 2016
#31
Or if your bribing a politician has been made legal by other bribery so that you don't have to worry
cascadiance
Jan 2016
#40
OF COURSE he has! The whole gosh darned thing is one big huge corporate bribe.
PatrickforO
Jan 2016
#41