Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Danish teen fought off her attacker - now she'll face fine [View all]beevul
(12,194 posts)243. Oh, I completely believe that.
Conscience? Oh my conscience is just fine
Oh, I completely believe that. What you don't seem to understand, is that your clear conscience indicates much about your position, none of it good. Or maybe you're completely aware of how it makes you look, and just don't care. The reader can decide for themselves, but either way, it paints quite an unflattering picture.
As for evidence, I posted multiple links up thread to things like stats showing the Danes having far lower levels of rape than America.
I don't doubt that you did, however, such stats are meaningless to this debate. The rape victim in the Op is not a number, and I'd be very interested in seeing the look on her face if she saw you reducing her to one. Frankly, it doesn't matter if the stats you quote show that theres only 1 rape per year. Denying people reasonable tools of self defense is wrong, and theres simply no legitimate justification for it. The best you can do, amounts to "individuals must take one for the team", which is unethical immoral, and anything BUT liberal. Its indefensible, and everyone in this thread gets it, except you.
But of course they're the ones with the 'disgustingly sick' society.
If they deny their individual citizens effective tools of self defense, yes. Yes they are. If I were made aware of a society where one was not allowed a fire extinguisher, where the old, the infirm, and the physically weak/vulnerable could only rely on the fire department to put out fires for ANY reason, I'd call it sick too and so would everyone else. And We'd all be right, just like we are now.
Less rapes, less murders higher on the indexes for happiness and health, but very few guns so 'fuck their society' right?
Less rapes? SO what This isn't about how many there are, this is about what options potential victims are allowed by 'society', at the point of contact. Less murders? Non-sequitur. This isn't about the degree to which a society has problems. That's not the metric being used here. Higher on the indexes for happiness and health? Non-sequitur. Again, this isn't about the degree to which a society has problems. That's not the metric being used here. But very few guns? You're still trying to make this about guns? Hello? Haven't you been paying attention? This is about PEPPER SPRAY. I find your attempts to make this about guns to be parochial, sophomoric, and pathetic. And I'm only being that charitable to stay within posting rules here. You are incapable of creating that rabbit hole and enticing me into going down it. That you continue to try, smacks of desperation. Grasping at straws. And strawmen.
so 'fuck their society'
Yup. Fuck that society. It may not have occurred to you, but the rape victim in the OP said "fuck this society" the moment she bought pepper spray. It only makes sense, that your ire is as great toward her for saying it through action, as it is toward me for uttering the words. You should think about that for a minute. Really hard. Would you feel the same way if your mother had been the victim?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
277 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If the law obligates her to be defenseless to the point of being violently rape the law is unjust.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#2
If she can't fight off her attacker under her own power whose fault is that?
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#17
If the law obligates someone to remain defenseless when confronted by a predator the is unjust.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#22
The logical destination of that argument is that possession and carry of all weapons should be legal
Kentonio
Jan 2016
#24
Please show me one place where it is legal to carry a weapon in the commission of a crime.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#38
In Europe carrying most weapons is illegal. You don't need to catch someone in the act.
Kentonio
Jan 2016
#43
Well, her assailant was unarmed so, yes, I suppose you could say there is less weapon crime.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#50
The western European countries are strongly against public carrying of weapons in public
Kentonio
Jan 2016
#54
"The expectation in Europe is that society is kept safe by thorough and competent law enforcement"
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#59
I support the right to self defense. Self defense trumps opinions and hurt feelings.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#105
The people seem quite agreeable. It's the morally bankrupt government that is the issue.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#111
We just got done commemorating Rev. King's birthday because he taught us -- yet again --
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#124
It is not an unjust law, and frankly I finding you using King here to be quite inappropriate.
Kentonio
Jan 2016
#127
This is why there is such a furor in Europe over immigration. It's two years in Germany also.
Yo_Mama
Jan 2016
#99
Yes, I would. I am a woman. Of the women I've known who have been raped, the only
Yo_Mama
Jan 2016
#108
That's still not nearly enough. Especially if it was particularly violent.
smirkymonkey
Jan 2016
#92
Europe base their criminal justice systems more around rehabilitation than punishment.
Kentonio
Jan 2016
#94
This is a stupid argument, IMO. If gangs of criminals or individuals with Uzis were
Yo_Mama
Jan 2016
#65
"Yes, women who are under credible threat of rape should be allowed to carry defensive weaponry"
Kentonio
Jan 2016
#82
She is a woman with a credible threat and still you want her prosecuted.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#90
I don't want her to be prosecuted, its not something that gives me any pleasure or happiness
Kentonio
Jan 2016
#93
People who use it in assaults or robberies can be prosecuted for using it inappropriately.
pnwmom
Jan 2016
#144
It shouldn't be banned for defensive purposes. It's insane for any of our states
pnwmom
Jan 2016
#180
Laws regarding pepper spray vary and there are many types and strengths of pepper spray
azurnoir
Jan 2016
#5
would you restrict the sale to women only? what's to stop an assailant from purchasing it and using
azurnoir
Jan 2016
#20
"what's to stop an assailant from purchasing it and using it on a victim"
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#23
So what of her age? Does her age somehow obligate her to remain defenseless?
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#28
Taking a gun from an assailant is quite a bit different from possessing a gun yourself
azurnoir
Jan 2016
#32
The authorities failed to protect. The people are not obligated to remain defenseless.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#39
No person who defends themelves from a criminal predaor should also have to
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#44
Well, she wouldn't if I had anything to say about it, and if she does get fined,
Yo_Mama
Jan 2016
#102
You probably don't want to compare sexual equality between the US and Denmark..
Kentonio
Jan 2016
#10
ah yaaa Sweden, Norway, the UK , Iceland are all known for their misogyny-rrrright
azurnoir
Jan 2016
#13
Are you saying discussing rape statistics is xenophobia just because the statistics are for another
PersonNumber503602
Jan 2016
#133
Looks to me like you are blaming much of it on the migrants. And what statistics are in your post?
A Simple Game
Jan 2016
#139
Well yeah they are. Some of the highest sexual assault rates in the industrialized world
Recursion
Jan 2016
#80
Forget it. Let me take a wild guess. Everyone who is defending this decision is male.
smirkymonkey
Jan 2016
#89
I'm writing this from Europe where I'm currently living, so I feel quite qualified to do so.
Kentonio
Jan 2016
#225
And what is this, "Women should appeal to their government to change the law" crap?
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#15
Pardon not granted as I am disinclined to seek favor with those having obvious control issues.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#49
Huh. Danes sound like they are taking lessons from ISIS on how to treat women. n/t
jtuck004
Jan 2016
#29
lol. That will comfort her as she pays a fine for having to use pepper spray on a creep. I'll
jtuck004
Jan 2016
#141
Lol. Sure, slavery and subjugation and assault mean equality, the right to be attacked
jtuck004
Jan 2016
#149
Because obviously we make laws based on individual outlier cases like this one..
Kentonio
Jan 2016
#156
Remind me of the single gun crime incident which caused everyone to suddenly try and regulate
Kentonio
Jan 2016
#161
A teenage girl has a duty to be raped because you fear her pepper spray will lead to another SH?
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#197
When the decision came between the law or stopping a rapist you chose the law as higher importance.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#208
It's not crap if it's what you've been saying the entire thread: law > rape victims
Nuclear Unicorn
Jan 2016
#213
Not bullshit at all-you've produced no evidence. What you promote is the ethos of Inspector Javert
friendly_iconoclast
Jan 2016
#240
I just wanted to note that pepper spray is hardly banned anywhere in the USA,
branford
Jan 2016
#277
In some twisted way you think assaulting defenseless women represents equality.
jtuck004
Jan 2016
#162
You really think gender equality has fuck-all to do with defending yourself from a rape?
NickB79
Jan 2016
#229
The attacker was described as an "English-speaking man in dark clothing".
surrealAmerican
Jan 2016
#125
Not really. English, while not the official language, is the most common second language...
Lancero
Jan 2016
#168
I have a feeling that they are mostly just anti-self defense when it comes to women.
smirkymonkey
Jan 2016
#146
Unreal. It seems to me, from reading the comments of Europeans in both the
smirkymonkey
Jan 2016
#183
Yes, exactly, but it seems like the Governments and LEO's haven't quite caught up yet with the
smirkymonkey
Jan 2016
#185
The law enforcement / self-defense far leftward tilt is separate from and predates
branford
Jan 2016
#188
It would appear that a number of DUers regard Inspector Javert as a role model...
friendly_iconoclast
Jan 2016
#233
+10^10. The authoritarian nature of the 'self-defense prohibitionists' has been revealed
friendly_iconoclast
Jan 2016
#232
Because the tool which was used for self-defense is entirely irrelevant to the discussion.
redgreenandblue
Jan 2016
#245
The tool is relevant because it demonstrates that some self-proclaimed liberals
branford
Jan 2016
#249
Well they shouldn't fine her but if they do maybe people will chip in to pay it and
yellowcanine
Jan 2016
#222