Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Krugman is getting close to the edge [View all]patrice
(47,992 posts)71. How about The Dancer Upstairs? nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
109 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
He is a good economist who has no clue of the political realities of 21st century America
bluestateguy
Jun 2012
#2
Are you saying that Krugman might as well save himself the effort of offering good ideas?
ladjf
Jun 2012
#53
If his failing is that he underestimates the full effects of GOP obstructionism
Zalatix
Jun 2012
#35
He can. He's heard that argument. But he knows, logically, that when people in power
sabrina 1
Jun 2012
#39
Krugman is doing the job he signed on to do. He informs the public, AND elected
sabrina 1
Jun 2012
#86
I got here by way of a reference from Manny in another thread, and owe him for that.
Jackpine Radical
Jun 2012
#99
Remember LBJ needed 67 Votes not 60 to overcome the Filibuster on the Civil Rights Bill
happyslug
Jun 2012
#103
The problem is not with Krugman, it's with the politicians who have no clue of economic reality.
JVS
Jun 2012
#41
Krugman is doing a wonderful job of offering up a steady stream of good ideas about what
ladjf
Jun 2012
#52
I suspect he understands that political reality doesn't trump actual reality
TheKentuckian
Jun 2012
#55
You are a good person who has no clue of the realities of the current situation.
Jakes Progress
Jun 2012
#89
Bush spent it on war, a Keynesian would have flooded States w/ cash & kept public employees working
FarLeftFist
Jun 2012
#20
Bush spent not just in Iraq but DHS, TSA, Medicare Drugs, schools, CIA,
banned from Kos
Jun 2012
#23
Those "$300 checks" were loans, by the way. You paid it back on the following year's tax return.
PSPS
Jun 2012
#34
Bush & Cheney funneled the federal $$$ to their buddies and themselves, privatizing
suffragette
Jun 2012
#29
Well put. Bush's stimilus was real and in no way intended to benefit the middle class.
banned from Kos
Jun 2012
#51
Oh yeah, in No Country he's max-creepy. Have you seen him in Marquez' Love in the Time of Cholera? n
patrice
Jun 2012
#69
I used smaller words. I provided homey examples.... illustrated with cartoons....
jtuck004
Jun 2012
#22
HERE IS WHAT I THOUGHT WAS THE KEY PART OF DR. KRUGMAN'S ARGUMENT IN THE VIDEO
drynberg
Jun 2012
#57
K & R, excellent OT, CTHulu2016, excellent points in discussion, austerity talk
mother earth
Jun 2012
#61
The only thing that will finally sink into the nutjobs is "I told you so". Thats what happens
southernyankeebelle
Jun 2012
#85
I never bought the WMD in the first place. I blame the republicans for pushing it. I blame
southernyankeebelle
Jun 2012
#92