Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

denem

(11,045 posts)
2. Correlation does not prove causation.
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 04:47 AM
Jan 2016

Keeping an open mind, it seems reasonable that more severely depressed people would be prescribed anti-depressants, compared those less obviously ill.

The patents on nearly every anti-depressant expired years ago, so there's not much money in it for Pharma: $10/90days. But there is unrelenting pressure on Family Doctors to get through as many consultations as possible. Important issues, like abuse at home, bullying at school, seldom get a a look in - issues very relevant to teens

Pharma has a shameful record. Pop a magic pill like Valium, left millions in wretched misery. The correlation between depression and suicide is iron clad, the independent impact of anti-depressants less so. No ethics board on earth would allow a double blind trial, so there is only anecdotal, and correlation evidence

Q: Doctor I lost my job, and the bank is foreclosing. A: Celexa 40mg a day. Q: Army PTSD? A: Seroquel. Suppose both successfully suicide. The failure of the healthcare system goes way beyond meds.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»UK Telegraph: Antidepress...»Reply #2