Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The real threat to abortion in Florida isn't an all-out ban [View all]DirkGently
(12,151 posts)6. Would barriers to heart surgery reduce the need for them?
Medical procedures aren't "tragic," and don't need to be "rare." The "rare" framing begins with the false premise that there is something wrong with women getting the reproductive care they need.
But "safe, legal and rare" is not a framework that supports women's health needs: it stigmatizes and endangers it.
In a 2010 research article, Dr Tracy Weitz, Director of Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH) program at the University of California, San Francisco, wrote that "rare suggests that abortion is happening more than it should, and that there are some conditions for which abortions should and should not occur".
"It separates 'good' abortions from 'bad' abortions", she added.
Steph Herold, the deputy director of the Sea Change Program an organization that seeks to create a culture change around abortion and other stigmatized reproductive experiences like miscarriage and adoption agrees. "It implies that abortion is somehow different than other parts of healthcare," she told me. "We don't say that any other medical procedure should be rare."
In a 2010 research article, Dr Tracy Weitz, Director of Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH) program at the University of California, San Francisco, wrote that "rare suggests that abortion is happening more than it should, and that there are some conditions for which abortions should and should not occur".
"It separates 'good' abortions from 'bad' abortions", she added.
Steph Herold, the deputy director of the Sea Change Program an organization that seeks to create a culture change around abortion and other stigmatized reproductive experiences like miscarriage and adoption agrees. "It implies that abortion is somehow different than other parts of healthcare," she told me. "We don't say that any other medical procedure should be rare."
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jul/09/hillary-clinton-abortion-legal-but-rare
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Death by a thousand cuts. The "right to life" movement makes all kinds of noise
bullwinkle428
Jan 2016
#1
they have no interest in overturning Roe. they're achieving their goal w/o it.
nashville_brook
Jan 2016
#23
actually, HRC has done more than most to ensure that regulations/restrictions happened
nashville_brook
Jan 2016
#21
it' not a "hater's club" -- it's the truth, and you can ignore it if you like.
nashville_brook
Jan 2016
#24
there's no quotes from those sources. but, feel free to cast aspersions.
nashville_brook
Jan 2016
#27
compromise, in this arena, has led to the destruction of women's lives.
nashville_brook
Jan 2016
#25
+++ a million. In this context, this type of compromise = appeasement = death.
DirkGently
Jan 2016
#34
"Safe, legal and rare" is not just a "Clinton-era mantra". Obama has said it too.
Nye Bevan
Jan 2016
#11
I think one issue is that we Millennials have no memory of the world before Roe v. Wade.
Odin2005
Jan 2016
#19