General Discussion

karynnj

(60,997 posts)

65. What person are you speaking of who wants HRC in prison? It's not me and not the op, that I have

Mon Feb 1, 2016, 01:55 PM

Feb 2016

seen. Not to mention, what is this "don't deflect to Obama" suppose to mean? Do you seriously argue that this entire mess has not created a problem for him as the State Department? The SD briefing are easy to find - and questions come up at least weekly. Almost every month there has been a negative story because the SD has had difficulty meeting an arbitrary schedule -- likely because they prioritized being exceptionally careful about inadvertently putting out something that should be redacted over meeting the deadline.

The fact that there are bizarre allegations - ie Vince Foster - does not mean that have never been any fair questions asked. This op deals with an issue that has created a pretty big mess for the State Department and the Obama administration.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

73 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Obama may have a very difficult decision to make re: Hillary [View all] grasswire Feb 2016 OP

Another Clinton, another monumental lapse in judgement. I just want them to go away! onecaliberal Feb 2016 #1

Have you been awaiting HRC indictments for 20 years Hortensis Feb 2016 #27

No, and you're support of her proves you are the right leaning one. onecaliberal Feb 2016 #39

Even without an indictment or a recommendation of an indictment, this has been a blemish on Obama's karynnj Feb 2016 #48

Bypassing the State Department to rely on Blumenthal may have hedgehog Feb 2016 #53

I agree that it was not illegal karynnj Feb 2016 #56

Don't deflect to Obama. This is about the blemish Hortensis Feb 2016 #57

What person are you speaking of who wants HRC in prison? It's not me and not the op, that I have karynnj Feb 2016 #65

The people I'm talking want indictments, Hortensis Feb 2016 #70

oh, and another risk factor for Obama grasswire Feb 2016 #2

Not necessarily - we don't know how his email worked karynnj Feb 2016 #50

Not necessarily... Merryland Feb 2016 #54

This message was self-deleted by its author 840high Feb 2016 #60

If they're gonna indict her, do it soon tularetom Feb 2016 #3

Conservative Venus Fly Trap method. glinda Feb 2016 #6

Shouildn't this post be on the Primaries page? CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #4

Blatant Repugnant dishonesty, repeated......... Darb Feb 2016 #5

Hillary is the MOST ADMIRED WOMAN ON THE PLANET. Hortensis Feb 2016 #38

I'd be willing to bet she's also the most disliked woman in the U.S. cali Feb 2016 #41

Maybe this will help you with your thesis, Darb Feb 2016 #42

The "most admired" and "most disliked" are often one and the same. razorman Feb 2016 #67

The president doesn't control the Attorney General. Renew Deal Feb 2016 #7

At least the president is not supposed to control the AG. razorman Feb 2016 #66

You're being duped by the Rethugs. The only issue, as stated by Obama's spokesman, pnwmom Feb 2016 #8

you are operating on old information... grasswire Feb 2016 #9

Then link to the new information. Has the state department taken back pnwmom Feb 2016 #10

The only new information murielm99 Feb 2016 #11

I get most of my information from car thieves. Agschmid Feb 2016 #26

Drudge has it first. Hortensis Feb 2016 #34

Some Sanders Supporters, apparently. vorgan24 Feb 2016 #37

+1,000. Thank you for facts, pnwmom. Hekate Feb 2016 #15

And you're wrong again. jeff47 Feb 2016 #40

Won't happen, but the beneficiary will certainly be Martin O'Malley, not BS. Tarheel_Dem Feb 2016 #12

sincerely, how is that? hopemountain Feb 2016 #21

O'Malley is the only other Democrat in the race. Tarheel_Dem Feb 2016 #71

Watergate involved, among other things, illegal breaking and entering lovemydog Feb 2016 #13

+1,000. Thank you for facts, and I love your dog, too. Hekate Feb 2016 #16

Thanks Hekate. lovemydog Feb 2016 #18

And that's why even her accusers say that they're certain she'll never be pnwmom Feb 2016 #19

So it's just smears and innuendo, without any charges. lovemydog Feb 2016 #20

I agree that this is not Watergate and closer to the impeachment, but I differ on how to describe it karynnj Feb 2016 #64

Does the term "ex post facto" mean anything to Bernie Bros? Sheesh! jmowreader Feb 2016 #14

+1,000. Thank you for facts, jmowreader. LOVE your second point. Hekate Feb 2016 #17

who are berniebros? what do they have hopemountain Feb 2016 #22

Manning and Snowden? Really? thesquanderer Feb 2016 #28

And you'll want to claim that Clinton's 'mishandling' was to subvert our way of life or something? randome Feb 2016 #43

*If* she mishandled data, it would have been for her own benefit. (n/t) thesquanderer Feb 2016 #47

+1 to your last paragraph treestar Feb 2016 #35

Not actually "ex post facto" backtomn Feb 2016 #73

Wrong forum, but you knew that before posting didn't you. B Calm Feb 2016 #23

oh my god, it's all bullshit. it's another Benghazi ginned up by Republicans Lil Missy Feb 2016 #24

The facts still remain the same, none of the emails were classified top secret when she received B Calm Feb 2016 #25

What if she sent top secret info to Huma? Yupster Feb 2016 #44

and she might have called the Benghazi terrorists and said attack now. Blah, Blah, Blah B Calm Feb 2016 #45

What kind of a response is that? Yupster Feb 2016 #49

if she's to be indicted, I sure as hell hope it comes soon , preferably KingCharlemagne Feb 2016 #29

This is the anti-Hillary campaign if she is the nominee. Vinca Feb 2016 #30

But she raises a lot of money for the party! All those moneyed interests buying US off. RiverLover Feb 2016 #31

If it wasn't the emails, the cons would have fabricated some other type of BS. B Calm Feb 2016 #32

Unfortunately Hillary's home server was real & not fabricated awake Feb 2016 #59

You seem to have forgotten that the majority of Americans justiceischeap Feb 2016 #36

There is nothing "hanging over her head", Darb Feb 2016 #46

Of course I'm not on his side. Don't be silly. Vinca Feb 2016 #52

Is there any of her "baggage" that is ACTUALLY REAL? Darb Feb 2016 #62

some say she's campaigning precisely to shield herself from prosecution grasswire Feb 2016 #55

Okay Trey mythology Feb 2016 #33

If a criminal referral comes down from the FBI... hoosierlib Feb 2016 #51

I used to have to go to free republic or Fox Noise for such right-wing smears joeybee12 Feb 2016 #58

You can thank Hillary for all this. 840high Feb 2016 #61

Nope joeybee12 Feb 2016 #63

I don't think Hillary should be indicted, but it's a real possibility DemocraticWing Feb 2016 #68

This is just another smear that she will rise above mwrguy Feb 2016 #69

Locking In_The_Wind Feb 2016 #72