General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Refugees among gang caught on video dancing, singing in Arabic as they rape unconscious teen [View all]LiberalArkie
(19,821 posts)On Tue Feb 9, 2016, 03:12 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Yawn. You are obviously a 17 year old, or so.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=7596717
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Saying a poster is 'obviously' 17 is an insult. So is saying they need critical thinking courses.
JURY RESULTS
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Feb 9, 2016, 03:17 PM, and the Jury voted 6-1 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Rude and condescending. The whole response. So sick of this kind of thing. One of these insults maybe, but all combined makes it hideworthy.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I think Quantess is definitely describing themselves as "obviously a 17 year old" and needing "critical thinking courses". This Quantess may also need anger management classes
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Yes, it is. We need to stop critiquing posters and critique their post only.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Disruptive post that does nothing to foster a healthy dialogue, nor does it address any of the points made by the poster that is being insulted.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Easily refuted in a response that "I'm much older than 17." Why resort to censorship?
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Rude. Hide.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.