Refugees among gang caught on video dancing, singing in Arabic as they rape unconscious teen

[muriel_volestrangler]

170. Now you're talking about something completely different

A moment ago, you were calling for all single men and boys from some age to be barred from claiming asylum, and the be summarily ejected from a country if found. Now you're asking for them (and, I presume, everyone claiming asylum, whatever sex, age of marital status) to be investigated about whether they're genuine refugees - which happens already, to investigate to see if they have ISIS sympathies (which might, I suppose, mean they're not at risk where they flee from; but you're going to have problems determining what 'sympathies' mean someone is safe in a war zone), and that it's plausible that they could be deported after a jail sentence. Again, international law does stop countries sending people to places they're at risk in (this has been used occasionally to stop extradition to the USA), even if they're criminals.

What do you mean by 'forced to the end of the line'? There is a rule saying you have to process asylum claims, and you can't force them out of the country while you're doing it. Yes, you might prioritise who gets dealt with, so some get residency or employment status earlier or later, but that hasn't really been the purpose of various DUers in this thread. People are talking about chucking them out of the country altogether - or having some way of blocking unmarried males but not others - presumably a Trump-style wall or armed sea patrol. Which is why it's so sad to see DUers stoop to this.