Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Cruz may not be legally a Senator, much less a Pres. candidate. [View all]Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)76. Your not citing anything. Your expressing an opinion. Nothing more.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
173 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
He may not be a natural born citizen under the US Constitution. I agree with Lawrence Tribe: "murky"
merrily
Feb 2016
#1
Uless, of course, Mrs Cruz gave up her US citizenship for a Canadian citizenship.
seaotter
Feb 2016
#6
Your premise that dual citizenship was prohibited prior to 1977 is flawed
SickOfTheOnePct
Feb 2016
#105
Sure. I am not familiar with renouncing (yet--kidding), so I don't know if there would be a paper
merrily
Feb 2016
#58
In order for a person born abroad to a US Citizen or Citizens to become a US citizen,
Stonepounder
Feb 2016
#79
That's almost certainly right but the exact dates haven't been published AFAIK
Jim Lane
Feb 2016
#149
Thank you. Besides the fact that Cruz is EXACTLY who we want to run against in November
Bucky
Feb 2016
#21
There is a difference between falsely claiming Obama was born in Kenya and truthfully
merrily
Feb 2016
#128
Aside from the fact that it doesn't matter what Canada does or doesn't recognize
SickOfTheOnePct
Feb 2016
#9
He may be disqualified because I'm not sure he is actually a homo sapiens sapiens.
hobbit709
Feb 2016
#19
Was a Consular Report of Birth Abroad needed in 1970 if his parents filed for a US passport for him?
herding cats
Feb 2016
#22
Was it required if the parents did not apply for a passport for him was my question.
herding cats
Feb 2016
#34
Where are you getting that Canada didn't recognize dual citizenship until 1977?
SickOfTheOnePct
Feb 2016
#67
"children born in Canada to non-Canadian parents were not under any obligation to renounce a foreign
muriel_volestrangler
Feb 2016
#75
No. Physically nor Constitutionally. It's pretty obvious the FF meant "born HERE." NOT a tortuous
WinkyDink
Feb 2016
#43
How does "born abroad" mean "natural born citizen"? Didn't they know how to say "born abroad"?
WinkyDink
Feb 2016
#167
There's been a lot of law-contortion goin' on. CRUZ IS CANADIAN, and the Constitution means NOTHING.
WinkyDink
Feb 2016
#41
Agreed, as far as I'm concerned he is a US citizen. He's a creepy-as-hell US citizen. n/t
Turn CO Blue
Feb 2016
#95
The problem is that he's given up his Canadian citizenship in order to pretend he's American
Blueguyinthesky
Feb 2016
#117
So if he didn't specifically obtain US citizenship, he's an illegal. And since he renounced his
silvershadow
Feb 2016
#56
This is NOT bitherism. It has genuine legal foundation and does indeed impact Cruz being POTUS.
Ford_Prefect
Feb 2016
#93
To paraphrase an old adage........There are none so deaf as those who will not hear.
WillowTree
Feb 2016
#157
"Canada did not recognize dual citizenship in 1970 when Cruz was born in Alberta."
KamaAina
Feb 2016
#118
BS. He is an American by birth. Birthers left or right are wrong about this.
Sam_Fields
Feb 2016
#123
He is a Citizen but not the kind described in the Constitution as POTUS Eligible.
Ford_Prefect
Feb 2016
#127
The topic is not whether or not Cruz is an American citizen. Sorry to be nuancel (tm A. Haig).
WinkyDink
Feb 2016
#171