Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

morningfog

(18,115 posts)

1. It's what I've been saying. The super delegates are irrelevant at this point, and almost certainly

Reply to bigdarryl (Original post)

Thu Feb 11, 2016, 06:04 PM

Feb 2016

throughout the primary. There is almost no chance that the super delegates will be the deciding factor. And if they are, they will almost certainly go with whomever has a majority of the pledged delegates.

It is stupid to count them now and especially dumb to include them in state delegate totals.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Raw Story: The super delegate story on Hillary is complete B/S [View all] bigdarryl Feb 2016 OP

It's what I've been saying. The super delegates are irrelevant at this point, and almost certainly morningfog Feb 2016 #1

what's stupid is that they exist at all lame54 Feb 2016 #3

No argument there. morningfog Feb 2016 #4

Shh. It makes the Clinton supporters feel better. FBaggins Feb 2016 #2

Locking In_The_Wind Feb 2016 #5