Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Moral: don't send abusive PMs [View all]LeftishBrit
(41,453 posts)196. Nor have I - occasional disagreement but always civilized
I wish I could say the same about another board I was once briefly on, where one of the hosts went all paranoid about me, and accused me of keeping audiovisual material on them, etc., and even ended up phoning me at work from thousands of miles away (to avoid confusion, this was NOT Discussionist).
But never on DU in the nearly 12 years I've been on it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
201 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yeah, I wish those on time outs would lose pm privileges. I don't want to hear it!
cui bono
Feb 2016
#9
Gee, I would have thought the Reagan worship should have been enough of a reason.
LiberalAndProud
Feb 2016
#6
repeated "Under Review" while on time out and so far been coming back until now.
hobbit709
Feb 2016
#15
I congratulate a post, ask about a name and how they got it because some are so
roguevalley
Feb 2016
#62
I never expect anyone to believe I am who I say I am nor do I believe anyone on the internet
A Simple Game
Feb 2016
#57
on some things like fanfiction lists for shows like the HBO series Oz I post with a
roguevalley
Feb 2016
#63
Nice devils advocate, but that poster also questioned the race of another well know DUer.
Rex
Feb 2016
#176
Yes, finally another troll bites the dust. And your point is well taken cyberswede, abusive
seaglass
Feb 2016
#10
bout' time, but she is a "mystic" so I'm sure she will "mysteriously" be back LOL
snooper2
Feb 2016
#11
I'm not surprised, though I have seen more people comment on another DU mail harrasser.
demmiblue
Feb 2016
#14
Come to think of it, I did have one from her: "Whatever. She wik" (yes, that is all).
demmiblue
Feb 2016
#33
No, just multiple time-outs. Many of us have waited a long time for the other shoe to drop. nt
pinboy3niner
Feb 2016
#20
Not automatically, because a few really *are* alert stalked. I have seen it while
tblue37
Feb 2016
#105
agree and if they think this place is so horrible, then they should find a new place to play
demtenjeep
Feb 2016
#166
In my defense. I was pretty wasted when I PM'd you the Ted Cruz Patriotic Speedo Calendar. nt
Guy Whitey Corngood
Feb 2016
#31
I tend to agree - or Thatcher! - but I wouldn't have thought any regular DU-er would...
LeftishBrit
Feb 2016
#197
Ha, that is my question in ATA, might as well delete it then. There is one poster who has been
seaglass
Feb 2016
#139
I know of one DUer who sent abusive PMs to me and I believe SID and a few other
stevenleser
Feb 2016
#110
Agree, I don't see the worry in someone getting to post here that has been in time out 3 or more
Rex
Feb 2016
#179
If abusive PMs was all it took to get bounced, quite a few DUers would have been gone long ago
Major Nikon
Feb 2016
#119
Agree with you 100% on that. Time outs do no good. They come back and it's the same thing over
Autumn
Feb 2016
#153
I know people do alert stalk, it is just surprising to find out who it is at times.
Rex
Feb 2016
#186
That is so screwed up. Sorry you experienced that. You reminded me I wanted
stevenleser
Feb 2016
#189