Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: UPDATE - FALSE ALARM: Integrity: The Child Scott Walker Left Behind [View all]sybylla
(8,655 posts)48. How about another update: CCAP records show Gillick's claim may still have merit despite DKos art
http://bdgrdemocracy.wordpress.com/2012/06/03/ccap-records-show-dr-gillicks-claim-may-still-have-merit-despite-daily-kos-article/
Distraction? Yes. Rubbish? Don't count it out yet.
Dr. Gillick is a respected and highly esteemed researcher at the University of Minnesota. If she were making these allegations without merit and only on political grounds, she would lose her job, for violating ethical standards at a public university. The fact that she has legal representation in this matter also speaks to her having some evidence beyond a college story.
The CCAP case entry from 2004 referenced by the Bice comment does not fit the necessary timing to be relevant to this case. To wit:
Dr. Gillicks account took place in 1988 (she graduated in 1991) while she and her roommate Ruth were Freshmen. Scott Walker is said to have been 20 at the time. Indeed, these dates are consistent with historical facts.
The Scott Walker referenced in the Bice comment of Family Court CCAP record was born in April, 1961. The woman in the record (mother of the child) was born in 1962. There is no possible way Dr. Gillick would confuse, or have even known this other Scott Walker, much less been roommates with the mother at Marquette. They are both 6 7 years older that any of the parties cited by Dr. Gillick.
The bottom line this CCAP alibi is a ready-made cover story for Walker supporters. There is some merit to this story, and it should be allowed to develop as more real evidence is brought to light. In the meantime, continue the push to GOTV making history is within our reach. That is the focus.
Distraction? Yes. Rubbish? Don't count it out yet.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
72 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
UPDATE - FALSE ALARM: Integrity: The Child Scott Walker Left Behind [View all]
PeaceNikki
Jun 2012
OP
"Ain't gonna" go over well in conservative christian farm country I can tell you that
Ellipsis
Jun 2012
#14
There will be more then a few Walker signs gone on farmsteads if this is verified.
Ellipsis
Jun 2012
#18
Probably doesn't matter to his supporters, they've glossed over so much already... n/t
natrixgli
Jun 2012
#7
Scott Walker would have to impale babies on spikes to lose support from the enthralled masses.
PeaceNikki
Jun 2012
#8
let's just pray that it is true and that it swings enough votes to bring him down
Douglas Carpenter
Jun 2012
#11
My concern is hyping an unverified story could damage Barrett. Proceed with caution. n/t
natrixgli
Jun 2012
#12
meh, Barrett won't touch this but I will. He has no integrity whether this story is true or not.
PeaceNikki
Jun 2012
#13
University of Minnesota Scientist Drops Bombshell About Walker: Says He Fathered Child at Marquette
Ellipsis
Jun 2012
#34
Her/The attorney mentioned is quite capable and argued 20 cases before the Mn. Supreme court
Ellipsis
Jun 2012
#45
Its difficult to understand how this could stay a secret until Scott Walker's
undeterred
Jun 2012
#47
How about another update: CCAP records show Gillick's claim may still have merit despite DKos art
sybylla
Jun 2012
#48
That's what the blogger is saying. Bice has never been that reliable a reporter either.
sybylla
Jun 2012
#60
Gee, what a surprise that this particular OP posted this easily rebutted anonymous rumor
brentspeak
Jun 2012
#51
Is there any evidence.......any at all.......that the baby's mother isn't telling the truth?
WillowTree
Jun 2012
#68