Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
4. How do you think that applies
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 12:43 PM
Feb 2016

especially to the now?

I thought that the oath that I took for Federal employment was pretty dishonest.

The oath said "I am under no compulsion to take this oath."

I was thinking. Okay, if that is true, then I will not take it. I figured that if I said that, then I would NOT have a job.

Well that, right there, is a pretty darned strong compulsion is it not? But I was supposed to claim it was not there.

Anyway, here is the text of the whole thing. I do not see how you are applying this clause, or what you are taking to be clear violations.

http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/briefing/Oath_Office.htm

I mean, would it NOT be considered "defending the Constitution" to do everything in your power to prevent a person from getting on SCOTUS who thinks that position entitles him/her to re-write the Constitution?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»“. . . I take this obliga...»Reply #4