Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Scalia refused to read the NY Times or the Washington Post. [View all]elleng
(130,893 posts)1. How about he gathered all his RELEVANT information from the legal precedents he read?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
50 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
How about he gathered all his RELEVANT information from the legal precedents he read?
elleng
Feb 2016
#1
He was a piece of shit toward the end of his life, some cannot handle the fact their idol turned
Rex
Feb 2016
#23
I'm sorry, I see no indication that Scalia ever gave a rat's ass about precedent.
Atman
Feb 2016
#24
He never did, all he cared about what his own personal agenda against gays and minorities.
Rex
Feb 2016
#26
Feel free to ignore these threads then, because they are going to be up for a long time.
Rex
Feb 2016
#22
How about you simply pass on reading or commenting on any thread about him?
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
Feb 2016
#37
A lot of smart people turn into mindless zombies listening to hate radio. Scalia was no exception.
Rex
Feb 2016
#21