Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: -- A rather pointed statement on SCOTUS vacancy from Senator Warren -- [View all]tblue37
(68,444 posts)41. That Democrat was actually a Republican who had been recruited to switch parties
to run as Sebelius's lieutenant governor after her first lt. gov. (who also switched from R to D in order to run with her for her first term!) decided not to run again.
From Wikipedia:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Parkinson_(Kansas_politician)
In May 2006, Governor Kathleen Sebelius announced that Parkinson had switched parties and was her running mate for her reelection campaign, succeeding retiring lieutenant governor John E. Moore (also a former Republican who had switched parties shortly before he joined a ticket with Sebelius).[1] Parkinson's business experience and track record of working with both Republicans and Democrats were the reasons Sebelius gave for choosing him.
The Kansas Republican Party immediately labeled Parkinson a hypocrite, citing 2002 quotes where Parkinson called Sebelius a "left-wing liberal Democrat" and claimed that any Republicans who supported her were "either insincere or uninformed."[1] Parkinson responded to the criticism by saying he had doubted Sebelius four years earlier, but came to believe she provided "independent leadership" for the state. He stated: "In an age where leaders duck responsibility and dodge their mistakes let me be the first to say: I was wrong."[1] Some viewed his switch as opportunism; others felt his decision was another example of the bitter divide between moderates and conservatives in the Kansas Republican Party, and that the move encouraged more moderate Republican voters to move closer to the Democratic Party.
Kansas was a 3-party state--rather conservative Dems, somewhat moderate Republicans, and batguano insane RW Republicans. But the super RW Republicans primaried the moderate Rs out of the legislature, which is how Brownback got his rubberstamp legislature for his Koch backed agenda. The miderate Rs and the Dems used to work together in the legislature to prevent the extreme RWers from oing too much damage, but the RWers finally took over--probably with a fair amount of vote rigging, as the anomalous vote math from the last election has strongly suggested.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Precisely! I was horrified when Obama stole Sebelius from us and left Kansas to
tblue37
Feb 2016
#33
That Democrat was actually a Republican who had been recruited to switch parties
tblue37
Feb 2016
#41
Quite possibly, but since the integrity of the voting system has almost certainly
tblue37
Feb 2016
#44
The Reich Wing are for the Constitution except for when it benefits Democrats. Then, not so much.
kairos12
Feb 2016
#7
Unfortunately, others who hold constitutional offices have failed their duties, too.
SusanaMontana41
Feb 2016
#50
Republicans have not been constitutionally competent since Ronald 'Raygun' Reagan was elected.
Augiedog
Feb 2016
#17
Republicans love this country and its Constitution like a rapist loves their victims.
Raster
Feb 2016
#22
Three stars for Senator Warren. Now, if Senator Sanders will ask her to be his running mate:
Paper Roses
Feb 2016
#40