Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
15. threatened him and his family?
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 01:27 PM
Feb 2016

Seriously, or just economically and politically?

Politics is stranger and stranger. The other day I was at a meeting of Democrats for our county. We were trying to find candidates to run for the local offices - state senator, state rep, various county positions (like the treasurer position I ran for myself in 2012 (and lost badly, but in my defense, our sheriff candidate ran a great race - and finished with the same percentage as I did. I thought those races would be less political. I mean, none of the traditional guns or abortion or even taxes are in play, but all three of us D candidates finished with about the same percentage of the votes.)

Truly though, I was kinda shocked and saddened by that meeting. They kept mentioning moderate Republicans they wanted to get to run as Democrats. I mean I always joked that it seemed like Kansas politics was a conservative Republican running against a Democrat who was really a moderate Republican, but to actually see that in action. They also basically seemed to be looking for - somebody with deep pockets.

You seem to have a primary race though, so you are not stuck with the ex-Republican unless he wins the primary.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Heckuva 'party' we've got, eh, dws??? elleng Feb 2016 #1
Meh...fighting in those districts would be a waste of money. Xolodno Feb 2016 #33
Even if it's a sacrificial lamb, the Democrats need to run someone. backscatter712 Feb 2016 #41
Going to say, no. Xolodno Feb 2016 #42
Senator Pryor ran unopposed in 2008, how did he fare in 2014? CommonSenseDemocrat Feb 2016 #55
Thus sayeth the state party about half the districts in the state XemaSab Feb 2016 #54
This means they're running unopposed in the primary only, right? brush Feb 2016 #2
NOPE - No Dem candidate for that seat FreakinDJ Feb 2016 #4
Gawd! brush Feb 2016 #14
My purple district had an unopposed R last election. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #3
threatened him and his family? hfojvt Feb 2016 #15
Yes. Anonymous threats of harm left on voicemail. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #18
that's hard to believe hfojvt Feb 2016 #23
I'm here in FL, I've seen her shit first hand. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #26
I am not disputing you hfojvt Feb 2016 #32
Many liberal Democrats have changed to Ind in disgust. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #35
I don't see how that move accomplishes anything hfojvt Feb 2016 #36
Gotta give them a reason to vote. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #37
being party registered has nothing to do with voting hfojvt Feb 2016 #38
I don't think you've been comprehending what I'm saying. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #40
to some degree, people in the party do NOT like primaries hfojvt Feb 2016 #43
Local party officials left voicemails threatening physical harm... HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #45
in wisconsin we have this wonderful thing called targeted races dembotoz Feb 2016 #5
DNC/DLC starting to look more like RNC FreakinDJ Feb 2016 #6
Yes. I lived in a NW IA district until I was 25 and that is jwirr Feb 2016 #17
DCCC has a program too - Red to Blue Brother Buzz Feb 2016 #12
and with this policy they never will dembotoz Feb 2016 #22
I was pissed when they initally supported a local candidate early in the last midterm election..... Brother Buzz Feb 2016 #24
Any one of them could have a scandal Qutzupalotl Feb 2016 #25
I don't disagree Brother Buzz Feb 2016 #34
No excuse for not having at least a token candidate. Gidney N Cloyd Feb 2016 #7
Problem is...they know they are a token. Xolodno Feb 2016 #44
If it bugs you being a token then you're not the person to do it. Gidney N Cloyd Feb 2016 #46
Sad to say....it is an either/or situation. Xolodno Feb 2016 #48
Hard to get a candidate make the calls to raise cash. Friends and family are a target dembotoz Feb 2016 #52
Same in my area, plenty or R's running unopposed bhikkhu Feb 2016 #8
The Bernie Revolution will have their Own 50 State Solution FreakinDJ Feb 2016 #11
That will have to be the next step. HooptieWagon Feb 2016 #19
+1000 nt abelenkpe Feb 2016 #31
DWS has to go now! B Calm Feb 2016 #9
pretty sad hfojvt Feb 2016 #10
I'm curious why you think the 48th should be competitive onenote Feb 2016 #20
the OP said R +7 hfojvt Feb 2016 #21
Just where is the DNC? I'm beginning to wonder if we really have one. mountain grammy Feb 2016 #13
California: 24 Democrats running unopposed by repubs onenote Feb 2016 #16
So democratic voters in hard to win areas are just screwed. . B Calm Feb 2016 #27
Are they less screwed if they spend money on an unwindable election? onenote Feb 2016 #29
The most common way people give up their power is by thinking they don’t have any. –Alice Walker B Calm Feb 2016 #47
There is a candidate to run against Hunter. oldandhappy Feb 2016 #28
Shouldn't some real progressives run against them? Bohemianwriter Feb 2016 #30
Exactly my point FreakinDJ Feb 2016 #50
Dana Rohrabacher is beatable Sen. Walter Sobchak Feb 2016 #39
I know that Hunter is next to impossible to unseat nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #49
Thanks, Debbie! Iggo Feb 2016 #51
California is terrible about ceding elections to Republicans. XemaSab Feb 2016 #53
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»California: 4 Republican ...»Reply #15