Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
40. It would be fine
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 09:03 PM
Feb 2016

It would also be great if you followed your own council about lecturing others on what they choose to post.

How about he gathered all his RELEVANT information from the legal precedents he read? elleng Feb 2016 #1
Very doubtful he read the precedents. That's the job COLGATE4 Feb 2016 #2
I disagree. elleng Feb 2016 #3
Interesting. Why? COLGATE4 Feb 2016 #4
I'm a lawyer, elleng Feb 2016 #6
What have you seen (specifically) that leads you to COLGATE4 Feb 2016 #7
The Kalb Report: elleng Feb 2016 #8
i went through the whole tape. I find nothing that even remotely discusses COLGATE4 Feb 2016 #10
You don't know what you are talking about. former9thward Feb 2016 #15
Thanks former9thward. elleng Feb 2016 #25
Yes, thanks both of you for standing up for reality. Hortensis Feb 2016 #27
You're missing the point I was discussing with COLGATE4 Feb 2016 #29
So... RobinA Feb 2016 #33
Do you really think I could give you an intelligence answer former9thward Feb 2016 #41
Well, RobinA Feb 2016 #47
He was a piece of shit toward the end of his life, some cannot handle the fact their idol turned Rex Feb 2016 #23
I am absolutely astounded by this new-found love for COLGATE4 Feb 2016 #30
This Language - RobinA Feb 2016 #34
It's a hyper-technical understanding of the law, which enshrines process COLGATE4 Feb 2016 #36
Yeah, I Get That RobinA Feb 2016 #49
There's nothing new found about it ProudToBeBlueInRhody Feb 2016 #43
Yep. Unfortunately you're right. nt COLGATE4 Feb 2016 #45
I'm sorry, I see no indication that Scalia ever gave a rat's ass about precedent. Atman Feb 2016 #24
He never did, all he cared about what his own personal agenda against gays and minorities. Rex Feb 2016 #26
You mean like all those precedents for Bush v. Gore? Human101948 Feb 2016 #28
He's dead. MineralMan Feb 2016 #5
Let's not. Kingofalldems Feb 2016 #12
You're wrong here, MM. Reminding people of the REAL Scalia... JHB Feb 2016 #13
^^^This. nt laundry_queen Feb 2016 #35
Feel free to ignore these threads then, because they are going to be up for a long time. Rex Feb 2016 #22
How about you simply pass on reading or commenting on any thread about him? ProudToBeBlueInRhody Feb 2016 #37
How about I post as I choose? MineralMan Feb 2016 #38
And let others do the same--instead of telling them to move on. Kingofalldems Feb 2016 #39
It would be fine ProudToBeBlueInRhody Feb 2016 #40
Then don't whine when questioned! Nt Logical Feb 2016 #42
Unlike Palin, who reads "all of 'em." valerief Feb 2016 #9
Garbage in, garbage out JHB Feb 2016 #11
I don't blame him Carolina Feb 2016 #14
I was gonna say hfojvt Feb 2016 #50
A lot of DUers are about to refuse to read the Washington Post oberliner Feb 2016 #16
What was that? Kingofalldems Feb 2016 #17
Have you seen the posts about the Bernie civil rights photo? oberliner Feb 2016 #18
So he let assholes like OxyRush define the issues of the day for him. lpbk2713 Feb 2016 #19
A lot of smart people turn into mindless zombies listening to hate radio. Scalia was no exception. Rex Feb 2016 #21
Of course he was intellectually dishonest, I am surprised some are just realizing that by now. Rex Feb 2016 #20
Kick this for his internet pals, some who post here. Kingofalldems Feb 2016 #31
He was just your typical republican scumbag rockfordfile Feb 2016 #32
Everyone on the supreme court should listen to all sides of an issue 4bernie28 Feb 2016 #44
They do.* And then COLGATE4 Feb 2016 #46
And now he's dead. Iggo Feb 2016 #48
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Scalia refused to read th...»Reply #40