Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Oh come off of it. He took Ruth Ginsberg to the opera jberryhill Feb 2016 #1
And what does it say about Ruthie... gregcrawford Feb 2016 #15
It says she likes a good opera jberryhill Feb 2016 #16
It says she liked him for his good facets. Hortensis Feb 2016 #22
Correct, as I said, it's not as if these decisions affected them jberryhill Feb 2016 #26
And it has never appeared to me... gregcrawford Feb 2016 #28
Couldn't Agree More RobinA Feb 2016 #31
That is NOT what I meant. Notorious RBG is a Hortensis Feb 2016 #29
Who said she's not a fine woman jberryhill Feb 2016 #30
Overlooking foibles and peccadilloes... gregcrawford Feb 2016 #33
I agree with everything you have written in this thread. nt laundry_queen Feb 2016 #40
Justices attempt to influence outcomes Hortensis Feb 2016 #42
He had a very strange concept of justice. nm rhett o rick Feb 2016 #2
"Mere" Iggo Feb 2016 #3
That is the part that got to me too Sanity Claws Feb 2016 #6
It is, if you're an authoritarian. malthaussen Feb 2016 #11
THIS! Authoritarians feel that maintaining a strong Hortensis Feb 2016 #23
In Guy Sajer's book, The Forgotten Soldier, is an unforgettable vignette: malthaussen Feb 2016 #25
Authoritarianism relies on blind adherence to the status quo Major Nikon Feb 2016 #44
The title of the OP is apparently not an actual quote, though widely reported as such. nt eppur_se_muova Feb 2016 #18
but, but, his family and RBG loved him so... mountain grammy Feb 2016 #4
Can we dance now without all the sad people telling us that we are SoLeftIAmRight Feb 2016 #5
Most of those are right wing types anyway SwankyXomb Feb 2016 #17
you noticed that too. KG Feb 2016 #21
I noticed it too laundry_queen Feb 2016 #41
But he was a jenus! Brilliant mind, just look at his solid logic for sending an innocent person Rex Feb 2016 #7
That's been on my mind the last few days. The fact that ANYONE would reduce innocence.... Liberal Veteran Feb 2016 #8
Hence lastone Feb 2016 #9
My two cents FiveGoodMen Feb 2016 #10
well said kpete Feb 2016 #19
and mere factual death is no reason to confer respect on a piece of shit. Solly Mack Feb 2016 #12
Everything you need to know about this person is in that one sentence Scalded Nun Feb 2016 #13
I can't understanding how some of the pundits following his death are avaistheone1 Feb 2016 #14
Fat Tony was brilliant ... GeorgeGist Feb 2016 #20
Brilliance is no guarantee of decency. white_wolf Feb 2016 #24
And for me, that is the key. Ilsa Feb 2016 #36
A philosophical question: malthaussen Feb 2016 #47
"I didn't agree with his OUTcomes. But he had intelligent reasoning behind them all." HughBeaumont Feb 2016 #27
Oh, but don't gravedance. Act_of_Reparation Feb 2016 #32
Reminds of the parental philosophy Karma13612 Feb 2016 #34
Um, wouldn't factual innocence imply that the death sentence had not been properly reached? KamaAina Feb 2016 #35
No. Why would it? (nt) Recursion Feb 2016 #38
Legally, not at all. malthaussen Feb 2016 #45
This is the kind of amoral legalistic nitpicking that makes people hate lawyers. Odin2005 Feb 2016 #37
That's one way of looking at it. malthaussen Feb 2016 #46
I'm against the death penalty but I pretty much see his point there Recursion Feb 2016 #39
Kick and rec for our republican visitors. Kingofalldems Feb 2016 #43
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»SCALIA: "Mere factua...»Reply #20