Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: SCALIA: "Mere factual innocence is no reason not to carry out a death sentence properly reached." [View all]Hortensis
(58,785 posts)23. THIS! Authoritarians feel that maintaining a strong
social structure is more important than individual justice. For them, this is a high principle, as Malthaussen explained so well above.
Notably, in practice, they view with great suspicion people who find themselves on the wrong side of the law, and the natural tendency is to wish to believe those people did something wrong to deserve it. Here in the deep south we are surrounded by authoritarian mindsets and find this attitude affecting thinking on virtually every social issue.
As said, an authoritarian bent is very common -- among conservatives. Religious conservatism is almost synonymous with authoritarianism, God the highest authority of all, of course.
And if it sounds like authoritarianism would be integral to fascism, yes.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
SCALIA: "Mere factual innocence is no reason not to carry out a death sentence properly reached." [View all]
kpete
Feb 2016
OP
The title of the OP is apparently not an actual quote, though widely reported as such. nt
eppur_se_muova
Feb 2016
#18
But he was a jenus! Brilliant mind, just look at his solid logic for sending an innocent person
Rex
Feb 2016
#7
That's been on my mind the last few days. The fact that ANYONE would reduce innocence....
Liberal Veteran
Feb 2016
#8
"I didn't agree with his OUTcomes. But he had intelligent reasoning behind them all."
HughBeaumont
Feb 2016
#27
Um, wouldn't factual innocence imply that the death sentence had not been properly reached?
KamaAina
Feb 2016
#35
This is the kind of amoral legalistic nitpicking that makes people hate lawyers.
Odin2005
Feb 2016
#37