General Discussion

HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)

27. "I didn't agree with his OUTcomes. But he had intelligent reasoning behind them all."

Tue Feb 16, 2016, 04:18 PM

Feb 2016

This was from my FB feed. Not even kidding.

Yes, I imagine there was an amazing reason to interfere with a state-run recount of a Federal Election and install your buddy's dry drunk serial failure of a son to glad-hand corporations and gas the war machine up to full throttle.

Anyone who had a hand in the installation of the Shitdumb Scion doesn't deserve anything more than "participants in a coup".

This isn't even counting Scalia's other statements of sheer evil.

You Installed W. That Decision Killed Hundreds of Thousands. So Sod OFF.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

47 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

SCALIA: "Mere factual innocence is no reason not to carry out a death sentence properly reached." [View all] kpete Feb 2016 OP

Oh come off of it. He took Ruth Ginsberg to the opera jberryhill Feb 2016 #1

And what does it say about Ruthie... gregcrawford Feb 2016 #15

It says she likes a good opera jberryhill Feb 2016 #16

It says she liked him for his good facets. Hortensis Feb 2016 #22

Correct, as I said, it's not as if these decisions affected them jberryhill Feb 2016 #26

And it has never appeared to me... gregcrawford Feb 2016 #28

Couldn't Agree More RobinA Feb 2016 #31

That is NOT what I meant. Notorious RBG is a Hortensis Feb 2016 #29

Who said she's not a fine woman jberryhill Feb 2016 #30

Overlooking foibles and peccadilloes... gregcrawford Feb 2016 #33

I agree with everything you have written in this thread. nt laundry_queen Feb 2016 #40

Justices attempt to influence outcomes Hortensis Feb 2016 #42

He had a very strange concept of justice. nm rhett o rick Feb 2016 #2

"Mere" Iggo Feb 2016 #3

That is the part that got to me too Sanity Claws Feb 2016 #6

It is, if you're an authoritarian. malthaussen Feb 2016 #11

THIS! Authoritarians feel that maintaining a strong Hortensis Feb 2016 #23

In Guy Sajer's book, The Forgotten Soldier, is an unforgettable vignette: malthaussen Feb 2016 #25

Authoritarianism relies on blind adherence to the status quo Major Nikon Feb 2016 #44

The title of the OP is apparently not an actual quote, though widely reported as such. nt eppur_se_muova Feb 2016 #18

but, but, his family and RBG loved him so... mountain grammy Feb 2016 #4

Can we dance now without all the sad people telling us that we are SoLeftIAmRight Feb 2016 #5

Most of those are right wing types anyway SwankyXomb Feb 2016 #17

you noticed that too. KG Feb 2016 #21

I noticed it too laundry_queen Feb 2016 #41

But he was a jenus! Brilliant mind, just look at his solid logic for sending an innocent person Rex Feb 2016 #7

That's been on my mind the last few days. The fact that ANYONE would reduce innocence.... Liberal Veteran Feb 2016 #8

Hence lastone Feb 2016 #9

My two cents FiveGoodMen Feb 2016 #10

well said kpete Feb 2016 #19

and mere factual death is no reason to confer respect on a piece of shit. Solly Mack Feb 2016 #12

Everything you need to know about this person is in that one sentence Scalded Nun Feb 2016 #13

I can't understanding how some of the pundits following his death are avaistheone1 Feb 2016 #14

Fat Tony was brilliant ... GeorgeGist Feb 2016 #20

Brilliance is no guarantee of decency. white_wolf Feb 2016 #24

And for me, that is the key. Ilsa Feb 2016 #36

A philosophical question: malthaussen Feb 2016 #47

"I didn't agree with his OUTcomes. But he had intelligent reasoning behind them all." HughBeaumont Feb 2016 #27

Oh, but don't gravedance. Act_of_Reparation Feb 2016 #32

Reminds of the parental philosophy Karma13612 Feb 2016 #34

Um, wouldn't factual innocence imply that the death sentence had not been properly reached? KamaAina Feb 2016 #35

No. Why would it? (nt) Recursion Feb 2016 #38

Legally, not at all. malthaussen Feb 2016 #45

This is the kind of amoral legalistic nitpicking that makes people hate lawyers. Odin2005 Feb 2016 #37

That's one way of looking at it. malthaussen Feb 2016 #46

I'm against the death penalty but I pretty much see his point there Recursion Feb 2016 #39

Kick and rec for our republican visitors. Kingofalldems Feb 2016 #43