Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rufus dog

(8,419 posts)
1. Generally it is bad, depending on timing
Tue Feb 16, 2016, 05:51 PM
Feb 2016

Govt can't run like a business or a household.

So the theory (and effectively used for years) is basically as follows.

When business and consumer spending in contracting you increase govt spending to stimulate the economy. So if Obama tightened spending in 2008 the shit would have really hit the fan.

That being said the current debt is almost entirely caused by Republican admins. As you stated, Clinton had us on track to eliminate the debt. Problem was W cut taxes on the wealthy, money goes to savings or offshore, thus no stimulus, AND increased spending.

This is nothing new, Arnold pulled the same crap in CA, the repubs do it all the time, as a plan, so they can then ask for shared sacrifice, which in reality is cuts in social programs along with increased local fees so in effect the poor get shafted and the middle/upper middle class takes a bigger portion of funding everything else while corporations and the rich see decreased contributions.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»question about the Nation...»Reply #1