Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

monicaangela

(1,508 posts)

3. It she does get the nomination

Reply to bluestateguy (Original post)

Tue Feb 16, 2016, 08:30 PM

Feb 2016

I hope it doesn't take her away from her case against Ferguson Missouri. I definitely want to see her make an example of that situation so that others will think twice before they prey upon poor minorities.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I will not be able to support Loretta Lynch for US Supreme Court [View all] bluestateguy Feb 2016 OP

I don't think you have any say in it. nt. demosincebirth Feb 2016 #1

WOW !!!! did you expect that snarky response ???? nt clarice Feb 2016 #2

It she does get the nomination monicaangela Feb 2016 #3

But but but, it's criminal justice reform... Oh wait. onecaliberal Feb 2016 #4

I actually agree with you. floriduck Feb 2016 #5

I believe the analysis that puts her high on the short list is horribly flawed. eom MohRokTah Feb 2016 #6

Concur jberryhill Feb 2016 #8

+1 n/t X_Digger Feb 2016 #11

Agreed. She's big on civil forfeiture, too, another strike against her. hifiguy Feb 2016 #7

I would pass on Lynch bigwillq Feb 2016 #9

So are in favor of the supreme court turning over marijuana laws? NobodyHere Feb 2016 #10

Setting aside every positive and negative TeddyR Feb 2016 #12

And she could entertain us with a song tavernier Feb 2016 #13

So is Hillary. Odin2005 Feb 2016 #14

Do you want a judge who will find bogus grounds for striking down statutes s/he disagrees with? Jim Lane Feb 2016 #15

You're going to wait a long time to find a SCOTUS nominee you can support onenote Feb 2016 #16