Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Recursion

(56,582 posts)

29. So, UCSF did a study last year

Reply to jeff47 (Reply #28)

Wed Feb 17, 2016, 12:32 PM

Feb 2016

https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2014/01/111071/how-much-does-it-cost-have-baby-hospital

Without complications, a vaginal birth can range from $3000 to $37,000, and a C-section can range from $8000 to $71,000. And that's the insurance price, without the "cheaper if you pay cash" effect.

Why shouldn't that be something the hospital tells you when you're choosing a hospital? Not everybody can afford $8000, but then again a lot of people can for a one-time, known-in-advance cost like that.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

39 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How to Cut Your Health-Care Bill: Pay Cash [View all] Recursion Feb 2016 OP

Completely broken system, ridiculous article. Warren Stupidity Feb 2016 #1

I've always found that argument ridiculous Recursion Feb 2016 #4

I shopped around for my orthodontist services when I needed braces jamzrockz Feb 2016 #10

99.9999 not ER? Care to back that up? Warren Stupidity Feb 2016 #11

Clearly 99.9999 was hyperbole; it's 2% of national costs Recursion Feb 2016 #12

This message was self-deleted by its author LanternWaste Feb 2016 #19

seeing the discounts associated with insureance this sounds like bs to me dembotoz Feb 2016 #2

Our problem with healthcare is one of price discovery Recursion Feb 2016 #5

........ daleanime Feb 2016 #3

As always, the answer to financial problems is "have more money" Orrex Feb 2016 #6

For some people, sure Recursion Feb 2016 #7

Of course that only works if they know about it in advance Orrex Feb 2016 #8

People really overstate how much medical expenses are unexpected Recursion Feb 2016 #9

That's foolish. You're telling people to plan only for a best-case scenario Orrex Feb 2016 #13

The unexpected costs are why we have insurance Recursion Feb 2016 #15

Again, the advice is "have more money" Orrex Feb 2016 #16

. Iggo Feb 2016 #27

Insurers are not trying to save you money. bemildred Feb 2016 #14

They don't even seem to be trying to save *themselves* money Recursion Feb 2016 #21

High prices increase their cut. Duh. bemildred Feb 2016 #23

So, I should pause my heart attack and negotiate prices first? Wounded Bear Feb 2016 #17

Of course not. Orrex Feb 2016 #18

FFS this is such a ridiculous strawman Recursion Feb 2016 #20

If you can't see it... Wounded Bear Feb 2016 #22

So, nothing? Recursion Feb 2016 #24

I've read three specific answers to that particular question in this thread. LanternWaste Feb 2016 #25

Can you point to them? I see "ZOMG PEOPLE ARE TOO POOR TO PAY FOR IT" Recursion Feb 2016 #26

My daughter cost $5,000 a pound. jeff47 Feb 2016 #28

So, UCSF did a study last year Recursion Feb 2016 #29

Because they are not known-in-advance costs. jeff47 Feb 2016 #30

Well, hell, having insurance is also unworkable for anyone who isn't wealthy Recursion Feb 2016 #31

Golly, it's almost like we need a single-payer system. (nt) jeff47 Feb 2016 #32

That wouldn't fix price discrepancies (in some ways it makes them worse) Recursion Feb 2016 #33

Only if that single-payer system can not negotiate. (nt) jeff47 Feb 2016 #34

If Medicare can't, why would a universal system be able to? Recursion Feb 2016 #35

Because Medicare doesn't negotiate much. jeff47 Feb 2016 #36

Did you even bother to google? Recursion Feb 2016 #37

Before I had insurance I had to pre-pay for operations csziggy Feb 2016 #38

Personal experience says .... GeorgeGist Feb 2016 #39