Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,971 posts)

5. Didn't she do that

Reply to HughBeaumont (Reply #3)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 12:11 PM

Feb 2016

because she reportedly wanted to retire under a Republican President?

How magnanimous of her to be supportive of President Obama doing what he is supposed to be his right and privilege as POTUS- and something, I might add, has NEVER been called into question before.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sandra Day O'Connor: Obama should name Scalia's replacement [View all] malaise Feb 2016 OP

If I never hear from that ex-justice again, it will be too soon JimDandy Feb 2016 #1

True re Bush v Gore but at least she got this one right n/t malaise Feb 2016 #2

"I don't agree (with Republicans)" . . . said Mrs. 5-4. HughBeaumont Feb 2016 #3

Didn't she do that Proud Liberal Dem Feb 2016 #5

Yes, which makes it even more despicable. HughBeaumont Feb 2016 #6

Duty, job, requirement... Wounded Bear Feb 2016 #7

K&R for exposure MagickMuffin Feb 2016 #4