Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SaveTheMackerel

(37 posts)
13. The strong will find a way to dominate what is free.
Sat Feb 20, 2016, 10:53 AM
Feb 2016

If TV is free, 100's more people will apply. Who chooses who gets to use it?

As for tax payer funded campaigns:
The big players will find a way to win that game too. Candidates first must qualify for the public funds. The big players will hire signature collectors to go get them to the top of the list to get the funds.


We can also limit all donation sizes to $1000. That would be good, but not enforceable.

A problem with limiting contribution sizes is the contributers can't stay anonymous. If your employer is of the other party, you will think twice before contributing.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Let's see, who would be devastated and who would have company ? orpupilofnature57 Jun 2015 #1
Sounds like its madokie Jun 2015 #2
Self kick.... SusanCalvin Jun 2015 #3
This is very interesting. truedelphi Jun 2015 #4
Thanks - me too. nt SusanCalvin Jun 2015 #5
K&R nt flying rabbit Jun 2015 #6
Another campaign finance reform proposal muktiman Aug 2015 #7
and another thing muktiman Aug 2015 #8
Completely agree, have thought so for years. SusanCalvin Aug 2015 #9
From a newbie muktiman Aug 2015 #10
OP is "original post." SusanCalvin Aug 2015 #11
Here's what I'm talking about - when ER was active. SusanCalvin Aug 2015 #12
The strong will find a way to dominate what is free. SaveTheMackerel Feb 2016 #13
Contribution sizes are already limited, at least for direct contributions, not SuperPACs. SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #14
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A new campaign finance id...»Reply #13