Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
14. Contribution sizes are already limited, at least for direct contributions, not SuperPACs.
Sun Feb 21, 2016, 11:58 AM
Feb 2016

I haven't reread my original post, but thanks for being interested. I see from your profile that you don't trust electronic voting either.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Let's see, who would be devastated and who would have company ? orpupilofnature57 Jun 2015 #1
Sounds like its madokie Jun 2015 #2
Self kick.... SusanCalvin Jun 2015 #3
This is very interesting. truedelphi Jun 2015 #4
Thanks - me too. nt SusanCalvin Jun 2015 #5
K&R nt flying rabbit Jun 2015 #6
Another campaign finance reform proposal muktiman Aug 2015 #7
and another thing muktiman Aug 2015 #8
Completely agree, have thought so for years. SusanCalvin Aug 2015 #9
From a newbie muktiman Aug 2015 #10
OP is "original post." SusanCalvin Aug 2015 #11
Here's what I'm talking about - when ER was active. SusanCalvin Aug 2015 #12
The strong will find a way to dominate what is free. SaveTheMackerel Feb 2016 #13
Contribution sizes are already limited, at least for direct contributions, not SuperPACs. SusanCalvin Feb 2016 #14
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A new campaign finance id...»Reply #14