Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
14. Then it's a pretty lousy way to go about doing it.
Thu Feb 25, 2016, 12:16 PM
Feb 2016

Because the TPP doesn't prevent countries from giving similar favored trade to China.

If Vietnam wants to sign a "free trade" pact with China, it can. Which means the TPP can't actually isolate China.

The TPP offers protections for union organizing, wages, environmental impact, discrimination and for copyright & patentsc etc. The hope is that workers in these other countries will now unionize and bring their own wages up (improving their lives) as well as making the US more competitive

So did CAFTA. We've never attempted to enforce those provisions, and people attempting to organize unions in CAFTA countries are routinely killed. Including during Obama's terms.

Why would the TPP be different?

Also, the intellectual property provisions actually make the situation worse for most TPP countries. They are having to make their patents and copyrights longer, greatly increasing drug prices among other things.

It also has reduced tariffs in other countries. I know Japan had to give up tariffs it had on US auto imports (they're being phased out over five years, I think).

Average Japanese tariff on US goods is 1%. Fluctuations between the Yen and the Dollar are much larger than 1%.

86% of the GDP covered by the TPP is already covered by free trade agreements. 12% of the remaining GDP is Japan, with those "crippling" 1% tariffs. That leaves an utterly insignificant size of a market to "open" to trade.

In return, the TPP makes it much easier and safer to export capital from the US. So that US money can more easily create jobs in other countries, instead of creating jobs in the US.

If you're not in the 1%, there is nothing good in the TPP.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A concern that I MUST sha...»Reply #14