Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

onenote

(46,147 posts)

5. Untrue.

Reply to FSogol (Reply #3)

Thu Feb 25, 2016, 02:22 PM

Feb 2016

Alito was asked how the Court will cope with the vacancy created by the Scalia nomination and he answered that the Court would deal with it, pointing out that the Constitution doesn't specify the number of justices.

Its the same answer every one of the Justices would have given to that question.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

SCOTUS Justices thoughts about replacing Associate Justice Scalia [View all] PJMcK Feb 2016 OP

I too would love to hear their thoughts on the matter! Dustlawyer Feb 2016 #1

Deleting. Misread a misleading DailyKos article. n/t FSogol Feb 2016 #3

Untrue. onenote Feb 2016 #5

Alito did not agree with McConnell. Justice Feb 2016 #6

Alito has already voiced an opinion malaise Feb 2016 #4

They can give their opinions, but they have no official leverage in this matter Orrex Feb 2016 #2

The backlog is at the District and Appellate Court levels so SCOTUS Justices have and will continue Justice Feb 2016 #7

The Republican Party is playing their last Wellstone ruled Feb 2016 #8

There is a backlog, but I don't see how that relates to the Scalia vacancy onenote Feb 2016 #9

Obama's interview for potential nominees. randome Feb 2016 #10