Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onenote

(46,149 posts)
9. There is a backlog, but I don't see how that relates to the Scalia vacancy
Thu Feb 25, 2016, 03:30 PM
Feb 2016

Roberts, in his annual report on the state of the judiciary has in the past mentioned to slow pace of confirmations, although I don't know that he has commented on it in the last several years.

Moreover, the backlog ebbs and flows and there are multiple reasons for it.

On January 1, 2009 (a few weeks before Bush left office), there were 53 vacancies (for which no one had yet been nominated in 27 instances).

On January 1, 2010, after a year in office (with a Democratic Senate), there were 100 vacancies , for which no one had been nominated in 80 instances).

By January 1, 2015, the number of vacancies had dropped to 43 with no pending confirmations (meaning no one had been nominated for any of the 43 vacancies)>

And as of January 1, 2016, the number of vacancies had climbed back to 76, with nominations pending to fill 34 of those vacancies, and no one nominate for the other 42.

http://www.uscourts.gov/judges-judgeships/judicial-vacancies


As general matter, President Obama has filled almost as many federal court of appeals and district court vacancies (321) during his first 7 years in office as Bush filled (323) in 8 years.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»SCOTUS Justices thoughts ...»Reply #9