Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Algernon Moncrieff

(5,961 posts)
7. The FIO would need to be grown into something bigger and more muscular that what's there now
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 02:15 AM
Feb 2016

If insurance is to be sold across state lines, then there needs to be a capable federal regulator. I think even the insurance industry would concede that.

Operating across state lines allows for creation of a larger risk pool, which (in theory) is always a safer bet. And, it would create economies of scale, so if the requirement remained that 80% (or is it 85?) of premium has to be spent on patient care, then it should (again, in theory) produce lower costs with more stabilized outlays.

My theory is that I'd be fine with one or two large companies basically taking the market, but the condition for the grand bargain would be that the companies would be regulated like utilities used to be -- rates would have to be approved and profits would be guaranteed, but at a very modest level. Basically, enough to money to attract bright, capable people to manage the enterprise,, but not enough to be paying 7 or 8 figure bonuses to execs.

IIRC, Germany essentially has an arrangement like this -- a big quasi-private company runs the healthcare system under strict regulation.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Buy health insurance acro...»Reply #7