Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NickB79

(20,286 posts)
13. A 100-ft wide rock would pack quite the punch
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 03:55 PM
Feb 2016

Not mass extinction level punch, mind you, but still enough to starve a bunch of us to death through crop failures and weather alternations.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's like winning the powerball SoLeftIAmRight Feb 2016 #1
me too but it's a lovuian Feb 2016 #2
My luck ThoughtCriminal Feb 2016 #9
On the same day. nt awoke_in_2003 Feb 2016 #15
LOL!!! RKP5637 Feb 2016 #26
Better call Harry Stamper. underahedgerow Feb 2016 #3
GMTA Brother Buzz Feb 2016 #5
"Yippee-ki-yay, underahedgerow Feb 2016 #10
You know we're sitting on four million pounds of fuel.... Brother Buzz Feb 2016 #11
There was a quote by one of the early Mercury Astronauts.... A HERETIC I AM Feb 2016 #16
I think it was Alan Shepard. cherokeeprogressive Feb 2016 #22
Like winning the powerball, it only takes one to win Brother Buzz Feb 2016 #4
trump would build a wall to prevent it dembotoz Feb 2016 #6
That's what I heard, as well. Blue_In_AK Feb 2016 #7
I noticed the Russians are working on it lovuian Feb 2016 #8
2013 TX68 should aim for the next GOP debate site. Solly Mack Feb 2016 #12
It's got Texas' name on it. randome Feb 2016 #18
A 100-ft wide rock would pack quite the punch NickB79 Feb 2016 #13
About twice the power of the Chelyabinsk meteor, which was 65 ft muriel_volestrangler Feb 2016 #20
The Chelyabinsk asteroid broke up in mid-air though and only produced an air blast NickB79 Feb 2016 #23
But it's not many nukes at once muriel_volestrangler Feb 2016 #25
Given the quoted variation in possible trajectaries Ghost Dog Feb 2016 #29
The probability of a hit on the 2nd is based on the probabilities of where it could go on the 1st muriel_volestrangler Feb 2016 #30
I'd call it a fuzzy probability. Ghost Dog Feb 2016 #32
See #31 - NASA is saying there is zero probability of a hit in the next century muriel_volestrangler Feb 2016 #33
Like winning the Powerball, except that in this case... Nitram Feb 2016 #14
70% chance it lands in water. n/t A HERETIC I AM Feb 2016 #17
That's funny, that lines up (nearly) with another forecast apocalypse date. Shandris Feb 2016 #19
Good thing ive been practicing on how to deal with exactly this scenario Warren DeMontague Feb 2016 #21
............ Tommy_Carcetti Feb 2016 #24
100 foot wide asteroid isn't big enough to destroy most life on the planet lunatica Feb 2016 #27
Only 100 foot Reter Feb 2016 #28
I've just realised, the Mirror has got this wrong - NASA is now saying *no* chance of a hit muriel_volestrangler Feb 2016 #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NASA admits there's 'a ch...»Reply #13