Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

denbot

(9,950 posts)

30. Yeah, we're total fucking savages..

Reply to Sen. Walter Sobchak (Reply #22)

Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:29 AM

Feb 2016

Maybe you're one of those hero's who set supposed hobo's on fire, just to cleanse you tide-line. It's not like the citizens of California have a right to access our shoreline.

By the way your excellency, I live in Manhattan Beach, and even though we are but mere peons to your Trump like magnificence, we manage to let our fellow humans (AKA total fucking savages) access to the shore.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

33 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Mogul Seeks $30 Million From California to Give Beach Access [View all] Red Oak Feb 2016 OP

So, he wants the State of California to buy back the access at a tune of $30 million MagickMuffin Feb 2016 #1

And once they do apply eminent domain, kentauros Feb 2016 #28

If the state suddenly passed such a law, branford Feb 2016 #29

He owns the rights to the beach. If they wanted it to remain public LittleBlue Feb 2016 #2

It doesn't work that way for coastal property. Public access is often protected. kcr Feb 2016 #4

I read the article and it appears it was protected retroactively LittleBlue Feb 2016 #5

There was a law passed in 2015, but it was a public beach long before then kcr Feb 2016 #6

The article implies that it was a private beach, branford Feb 2016 #8

The article implies a lot of things. kcr Feb 2016 #9

The article is indeed vague on some matters, branford Feb 2016 #10

Have you read anything about this other than that article? kcr Feb 2016 #11

It appears that the public had access with the consent of the prior owner, branford Feb 2016 #12

Where do you get that the state did not appear to have an easement? kcr Feb 2016 #13

Where does the state claim they had an easement? branford Feb 2016 #16

Prescriptive easement exists and has for a long time. No, he doesn't need to prove it kcr Feb 2016 #18

If the prior owners consented to access, there would be no prescriptive easement. branford Feb 2016 #20

.... Spider Jerusalem Feb 2016 #25

There are a lot of issues that the cited regulations do not appear to address, branford Feb 2016 #27

It's about the access road, not the beach itself. I think all CA beaches are public Recursion Feb 2016 #15

Upon further research you appear to be correct. branford Feb 2016 #17

No, they won't. It's just is own assertion that it's worth that. kcr Feb 2016 #19

See my post # 20. branford Feb 2016 #21

Can't do that in Oregon, all 363 miles of coast are free and open to the public..... Bluenorthwest Feb 2016 #3

This message was self-deleted by its author Recursion Feb 2016 #14

There's no dispute that Khosla owns the property. branford Feb 2016 #7

I'm not completely unsympathetic to him Sen. Walter Sobchak Feb 2016 #22

Yeah, we're total fucking savages.. denbot Feb 2016 #30

Philosophically I agree with you Sen. Walter Sobchak Feb 2016 #31

This message was self-deleted by its author denbot Feb 2016 #32

Fuck him. He is a fucking BILLIONAIRE. Cal Carpenter Feb 2016 #23

"People bemoan private property and ownership?" branford Feb 2016 #24

If its a private road he is free to lock the gate Travis_0004 Feb 2016 #26

Republican values up the wazoo AxionExcel Feb 2016 #33