Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

D Gary Grady

(133 posts)
38. The Emancipation Proclamation in reality freed millions of slaves
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 04:32 AM
Feb 2016

There is a popular historical myth that runs more or less like this: "The Emancipation Proclamation was mainly a PR effort aimed at winning support from anti-slavery advocates in Britain. It didn't apply to the four slave states that remained in the Union because Lincoln needed their political support, and given that the Confederate states obviously would not obey an order from Lincoln, the Proclamation had no actual effect." This sounds superficially quite plausible, but it's false.

First, the Emancipation Proclamation could not possibly have applied outside the rebellious areas because the only legal basis on which Lincoln could issue it was the general law of war and the Confiscation Acts, under which Lincoln could, in furtherance of the war effort, order seizure of enemy property such as wagons, buildings, munitions, crops, and in this case chattel slaves. On the day the Proclamation was issued, January 1, 1863, only a small number of slaves were freed by federal forces operating in rebellious areas. But as Union troops advanced farther and farther into the Confederacy, their officers carrying small printed copies of the Proclamation, millions more slaves were freed, until by mid-1865 the vast majority of slaves had been liberated.

On June 19, 1865, Major General Gordon Granger landed at Galveston, Texas, and announced that the Proclamation would be enforced in the state (hitherto largely outside the fight and hence with few federal troops). On that date in 1866 former slaves in Texas celebrated "Juneteenth" as the first anniversary of their freedom under the Proclamation. Obviously those men and women were not imagining when and why it had happened.

In fact, by the time the 13th Amendment was ratified in December of 1865, there were only two states in the Union that had not already outlawed slavery on their own, Delaware and Kentucky.

Needless to say, de facto slavery existed even after 1865 in various forms, and the effects of slavery, jim crow, and the like remain with us today. History is never simple. But we should give credit where it's due, and the Emancipation Proclamation deserves to be recalled for its greatness.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What, this shocks you? malthaussen Feb 2016 #1
I love the poorly educated underpants Feb 2016 #2
Well, yeah, those guys are zany. Herman4747 Feb 2016 #3
While the question was poorly worded nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #4
David Duke told his supporters to vote and volunteer for Trump today hibbing Feb 2016 #5
It really is the year 2016, isn't it? elljay Feb 2016 #6
That is exactly the way I feel. potone Feb 2016 #20
No surprise. moondust Feb 2016 #7
WTF? Rider3 Feb 2016 #8
The vulgar talking yam's supporters do not see African Americans as human beings KamaAina Feb 2016 #9
It was a push poll. After a series of questions about Obama's executive orders Recursion Feb 2016 #22
And the remaining 80% can't spell "slaves." nt eissa Feb 2016 #10
Sasha Baron Cohen got to the nub of it a while back Bad Dog Feb 2016 #11
Snopes points out that there is no confirmation of this contention. nt Nitram Feb 2016 #12
Bullshit. That number is much higher I'm sure. Liberal_Stalwart71 Feb 2016 #13
That's what I was thinking. dchill Feb 2016 #29
This has me thinking about "What if..." Risen Demon Feb 2016 #14
Jesus Christ robertgodardfromnj Feb 2016 #15
These are the same people that have Third Doctor Feb 2016 #16
It's not even like that was anything new skepticscott Feb 2016 #33
Eh, it's a poorly-worded question. malthaussen Feb 2016 #17
Thank you for pointing that out dumbcat Feb 2016 #28
OMG, get over the civil war already it was a hundred and fifty years ago! Dont call me Shirley Feb 2016 #18
A book showing how happy George Washingon's slaves were LastLiberal in PalmSprings Feb 2016 #19
They were so happy his prized chef Hercules ran away Generic Brad Feb 2016 #35
Official republican position - Lincoln was our nation's greatest leader keithbvadu2 Feb 2016 #21
The GOP like to claim Lincoln as their own because he was president when... Nitram Feb 2016 #27
Is there any way to deport these people? ultragreen Feb 2016 #23
I wish Abouttime Feb 2016 #24
while I don't doubt Trump supporters include large numbers of racists, ericson00 Feb 2016 #25
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2016 #26
I'll bet that 20 percent is part of the 1%. valerief Feb 2016 #30
Anyone who takes that seriously needs to take seriously all the racist blacks reported in this poll. Yo_Mama Feb 2016 #31
Thanks for adding this info oberliner Feb 2016 #40
Dumb ass question to begin with skepticscott Feb 2016 #32
The Emancipation Proclamation in reality freed millions of slaves D Gary Grady Feb 2016 #38
You're not telling me anything I don't know skepticscott Feb 2016 #41
Tens of thousands of slaves were freed the first day D Gary Grady Feb 2016 #43
How could it have been otherwise? skepticscott Feb 2016 #44
I suspect you mean the 13th Amendment D Gary Grady Feb 2016 #45
That "odd idea" as you call it skepticscott Feb 2016 #46
states' rights mang redruddyred Feb 2016 #34
These people think the Bill of Rights is too liberal. Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2016 #36
not surprising at all heaven05 Feb 2016 #37
Nearly 10 percent of Bernie's supporters disapprove of Lincoln freeing the slaves oberliner Feb 2016 #39
They don't want "free stuff" from the government... KansDem Feb 2016 #42
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Nearly 20 percent of Trum...»Reply #38