Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(106,004 posts)
31. I've just realised, the Mirror has got this wrong - NASA is now saying *no* chance of a hit
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 01:25 PM
Feb 2016

Here's the NASA page: https://www.nasa.gov/feature/jpl/small-asteroid-to-pass-close-to-earth-march-5

It's dated, at the top, Feb. 2, 2016. And it has, in normal font, this paragraph:

"During the upcoming March 5 flyby, asteroid 2013 TX68 could fly past Earth as far out as 9 million miles (14 million kilometers) or as close as 11,000 miles (17,000 kilometers). The variation in possible closest approach distances is due to the wide range of possible trajectories for this object, since it was tracked for only a short time after discovery.

Scientists at NASA's Center for NEO Studies (CNEOS) at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, have determined there is no possibility that this object could impact Earth during the flyby next month. But they have identified an extremely remote chance that this small asteroid could impact on Sep. 28, 2017, with odds of no more than 1-in-250-million. Flybys in 2046 and 2097 have an even lower probability of impact."

But, above that, in bold type, it has:

UPDATED ON FEB. 25 AT 2:40 P.M. PT:

Additional observations of asteroid 2013 TX68 have been obtained, refining its orbital path and moving the date of the asteroid’s Earth flyby from March 5 to March 8.

The observations, from archived images provided by the NASA-funded Pan-STARRS asteroid survey, enabled scientists at NASA's Center for Near-Earth Object Studies (CNEOS) at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, to refine their earlier flyby and distance predictions, reconfirming that the asteroid poses no threat to Earth.

"We already knew this asteroid, 2013 TX68, would safely fly past Earth in early March, but this additional data allow us to get a better handle on its orbital path," said Paul Chodas, manager of CNEOS. "The data indicate that this small asteroid will probably pass much farther away from Earth than previously thought."

Marco Micheli of the European Space Agency's NEO Coordination Centre (NEOCC/SpaceDys) in Frascati, Italy, is the astronomer who identified the object in the archived images, measured its position, and provided these observations to the Minor Planet Center in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

CNEOS's new prediction for 2013 TX68 is that it will fly by roughly 3 million miles (5 million kilometers) from our planet. There is still a chance that it could pass closer, but certainly no closer than 15,000 miles (24,000 kilometers) above Earth's surface. The new observations also better constrain the path of 2013 TX68 in future years; CNEOS has determined that 2013 TX68 cannot impact Earth over the next century.

"There is no concern whatsoever regarding this asteroid – unless you were interested in seeing it with a telescope," said Chodas. "Prospects for observing this asteroid, which were not very good to begin with, are now even worse because the asteroid is likely to be farther away, and therefore dimmer than previously believed."

So the change of mind that NASA had was to go from a 1 in 250-million chance to no chance.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's like winning the powerball SoLeftIAmRight Feb 2016 #1
me too but it's a lovuian Feb 2016 #2
My luck ThoughtCriminal Feb 2016 #9
On the same day. nt awoke_in_2003 Feb 2016 #15
LOL!!! RKP5637 Feb 2016 #26
Better call Harry Stamper. underahedgerow Feb 2016 #3
GMTA Brother Buzz Feb 2016 #5
"Yippee-ki-yay, underahedgerow Feb 2016 #10
You know we're sitting on four million pounds of fuel.... Brother Buzz Feb 2016 #11
There was a quote by one of the early Mercury Astronauts.... A HERETIC I AM Feb 2016 #16
I think it was Alan Shepard. cherokeeprogressive Feb 2016 #22
Like winning the powerball, it only takes one to win Brother Buzz Feb 2016 #4
trump would build a wall to prevent it dembotoz Feb 2016 #6
That's what I heard, as well. Blue_In_AK Feb 2016 #7
I noticed the Russians are working on it lovuian Feb 2016 #8
2013 TX68 should aim for the next GOP debate site. Solly Mack Feb 2016 #12
It's got Texas' name on it. randome Feb 2016 #18
A 100-ft wide rock would pack quite the punch NickB79 Feb 2016 #13
About twice the power of the Chelyabinsk meteor, which was 65 ft muriel_volestrangler Feb 2016 #20
The Chelyabinsk asteroid broke up in mid-air though and only produced an air blast NickB79 Feb 2016 #23
But it's not many nukes at once muriel_volestrangler Feb 2016 #25
Given the quoted variation in possible trajectaries Ghost Dog Feb 2016 #29
The probability of a hit on the 2nd is based on the probabilities of where it could go on the 1st muriel_volestrangler Feb 2016 #30
I'd call it a fuzzy probability. Ghost Dog Feb 2016 #32
See #31 - NASA is saying there is zero probability of a hit in the next century muriel_volestrangler Feb 2016 #33
Like winning the Powerball, except that in this case... Nitram Feb 2016 #14
70% chance it lands in water. n/t A HERETIC I AM Feb 2016 #17
That's funny, that lines up (nearly) with another forecast apocalypse date. Shandris Feb 2016 #19
Good thing ive been practicing on how to deal with exactly this scenario Warren DeMontague Feb 2016 #21
............ Tommy_Carcetti Feb 2016 #24
100 foot wide asteroid isn't big enough to destroy most life on the planet lunatica Feb 2016 #27
Only 100 foot Reter Feb 2016 #28
I've just realised, the Mirror has got this wrong - NASA is now saying *no* chance of a hit muriel_volestrangler Feb 2016 #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NASA admits there's 'a ch...»Reply #31