Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Bubzer

(4,211 posts)
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 04:54 PM Feb 2016

U.S. Wins WTO Case to destroy India's Solar Power Industry [View all]

We can expect actions like this, only 10 times worse, all across the globe, should the TPP pass...

The World Trade Organization has decided for the United States in its case to use trade rules to crush India’s nascent solar industry. Climate be damned, national sovereignty be damned, trade rules come first. Protecting multinational corporations is the highest priority to the U.S. government Saving the planet from catastrophic climate change is not. India had been successfully implementing plans to shift rapidly from dirty climate killing coal to clean solar by building a domestic solar panel production industry, but the U.S. trade representative, working in the interests of multinational corporations, will not allow it.

India's power system, predominantly fueled by coal, is notoriously unreliable, but solar power is coming to the rescue. Locally generated rooftop and industrial scale solar is empowering communities across India while reducing pollution and creating local jobs. But the U.S. trade office took offense that India had buy local provisions to protect their investments in developing their domestic solar power industry and filed a complaint with the World Trade Organization (WTO). The WTO found against India’s buy local provision to provide a reliable market for India's nascent solar power panel production industry. Ironically, the big winner in this case is China, the lowest cost producer of solar panels, not the United States. Moreover, buy local provisions have been used by U.S. states to build up local industries. This case could ultimately be turned against businesses in the United States that benefit from buy local rules if China went to the WTO fight for its manufacturers.

U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman was positively giddy about his successful effort to stifle growing competition in the developing world that might challenge the dominance of large multinational corporations in the energy industry.

"Today, the WTO panel agreed with the United States that India's 'localization' measures discriminate against US manufacturers and are against WTO rules," Froman said. The US and India "are strong supporters of the multilateral, rules-based trading system and take our WTO obligations seriously," he said. "This is an important outcome, not just as it applies to this case, but for the message it sends to other countries considering discriminatory 'localization' policies." "The United States strongly supports the rapid deployment of solar energy around the world - including in India," Froman said. "But discriminatory policies in the clean energy space in fact undermine our efforts to promote clean energy by requiring the use of more expensive and less efficient equipment, raising the cost of generating clean energy and making it more difficult for clean energy sources to be competitive," he said. The US had challenged the Government of India's imposition of domestic content requirements for solar cells and modules under India's National Solar Mission.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/02/26/1491700/-U-S-Wins-WTO-Case-to-Stomp-India-s-Nascent-Solar-Power-Industry?detail=facebook
39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I don't want trade agreements if they restrict communities from acting locally in their best Ed Suspicious Feb 2016 #1
What I want to know is this.... Bubzer Feb 2016 #3
The early 90s with NAFTA and WTO GATS. They were/are the two prototypes for US-style FTAs. Baobab Feb 2016 #14
Can you think of a better Republican whinefest Gabi Hayes Feb 2016 #4
The republican base has wanted the US out of the WTO (and the UN, the IMF, the World Bank and pampango Feb 2016 #5
The WTO is like the Mafia, you can't just leave. they know that, Thats just an act. Baobab Feb 2016 #16
Bernie was co-sponsor of a bill in 2005 to have the US withdraw from the WTO. pampango Feb 2016 #20
Yes, i totally support Bernie Sanders- Okay, here the section is GATS Article XXI procedure. Baobab Feb 2016 #29
None of your links have anything to do with "To leave the US would have to compensate the injured pampango Feb 2016 #39
USA!! USA!! Spreading democracy...or, something. Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2016 #2
as I understand it, India can still build its own solar power industry RussBLib Feb 2016 #6
You're correct. This article is highly misleading. First, the WTO is a voluntary agreement and okaawhatever Feb 2016 #13
You are correct and I want the truth rather than talking point. Jim Beard Feb 2016 #28
Thanks for that. I'm going to read the article now. nt okaawhatever Feb 2016 #30
More BS by the BS fans, no doubt. looks like a win for the US to me. Jitter65 Feb 2016 #15
Exporting LNG may cause a lot of homelessness-as well as a building boomlet in the US Baobab Feb 2016 #17
"Where have you been the last 20 years?" (Joking) (thats okay, I know.. here!) Baobab Feb 2016 #31
The WTO is a paper tiger. closeupready Feb 2016 #7
Are you kidding? India signed the agreement to prevent exactly this from occurring. randome Feb 2016 #9
No, I'm not kidding. The WTO does NOT enforce their rulings. closeupready Feb 2016 #11
Sure they do, look at the WTO US Online Gambling Case Baobab Feb 2016 #18
Which remained unenforced. So you reinforce my point. closeupready Feb 2016 #21
All international agencies are tools malaise Feb 2016 #8
And few of those international agencies existed under Herbert Hoover. FDR started pampango Feb 2016 #10
Partly true but I'm thinking more of the multilaterals malaise Feb 2016 #12
The real point is that prior to FDR, none of these international institutions existed. Under Herbert pampango Feb 2016 #19
FDR was in a world of 100% tariffs. jeff47 Feb 2016 #26
"The solutions for a 100% tariff world are not necessarily the solutions for a 0% tariff world."Good pampango Feb 2016 #38
Good response ut in diminishing the role of excessive nationalism malaise Feb 2016 #33
FDR and Truman proposed and supported the diminishment of 'national sovereigty' represented by pampango Feb 2016 #36
True but members of the 'club' are often given a pass malaise Feb 2016 #37
Obama Administration and india sending message to disregard Bernie and his talk about Baobab Feb 2016 #32
Wow, you're going to be really surprised and disappointed to find out where Sanders stands on this Recursion Feb 2016 #34
If you think this is about Obama malaise Feb 2016 #35
IMO this ruling is probably good for India LittleBlue Feb 2016 #22
our doesn't destroy their industry . it just means they compete with foreigners JI7 Feb 2016 #23
Who're you kidding... they'll be undercut by companies with old money. Bubzer Feb 2016 #24
isn't this a new industry ? one problem in India was lack of competition and JI7 Feb 2016 #25
It's a new industry, yes... lacking much in the way of support... Bubzer Feb 2016 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»U.S. Wins WTO Case to des...