"If you are anti-GMOs you are anti-science."

[katsy]

12. Good point.

Last edited Mon Mar 7, 2016, 08:37 PM - Edit history (1)

Science is a process and self corrects over time with testing and analysis. Science isn't static. People need to weigh benefits/risks, real or suspected, for themselves. Especially when the common good is NOT involved (I am rabidly pro vaccine).

http://prescriptiondrugs.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=005528

https://www.theguardian.com/science/occams-corner/2013/sep/17/scientific-studies-wrong

I'll repeat it: science is not static it's not a fucking religion and it self corrects as our knowledge grows.

Label gmos and let people make the choices. Corporations do not have the right to people's money without informing them what it is they are buying.

People have the right to not buy something even if it's just an "ewwwwww" factor.

People have the right to boycott Monsanto products just befuckingcause.

Labeling is required for people with peanut allergies even tho peanuts are scientifically non toxic.

I'm actually ok with cloned meat unless they decide to make it round-up ready 😂😂😂 for no other reason than I don't want my money going to Monsanto if I can help it. Just because it's my choice to make. I never ever set foot in a Walmart. Perfectly SAFE place to visit I heard but I don't give a shit. When given a choice I make one! I don't like monsantos corp policies of suing farmers, buying up all the seed companies... IMO they are dangerous and I reject their stuff whenever possible. Am I still a free person living in a democracy with the ability to do so?

Can democracy can endure without transparency and choice? Really? It's ok to boycott companies just because it's your choice to do so.

LABEL IT!