Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Altered Genes, Twisted Truth: How the Venture to Genetically Engineer Our Food Has Subverted Science [View all]proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)178. Are the health outcomes comparable? Paraphrasing Springsteen,"It's hard to be a saint in the city."
And it's hard to be healthy on a conventional contemporary American diet. eg. http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1208169
http://www.marthaherbert.org/library/EverydayEpigenetics-fromMolectoPublicHeatlhLifestyle-NAJMS2013.pdf
PUBLIC HEALTH AND LIFESTYLE EPIGENETICS CAN BE IMPLEMENTED NOW
At present we already know enough to improve the everyday
epigenetics of vast numbers of people. The problem here is
not scientific but economic and political. While targeted
epigenetic treatments may emerge in the future, and while
some of them may turn out to be benign, we do not have to
sit on our hands doing nothing while we wait for these
clinical trials to proceed (and often fail). For myriad reasons
a concerted attempt to improve the baseline everyday
epigenetics of the general population, and particularly the at
risk populations, is a path that we need to take as soon as
possible to reduce the comorbidity patterns and suffering we
are facing in autism spectrum disorder as well as many other
severe health conditions such as diabetes and obesity where
very similar considerations apply. The political and
economic programs are spelled out provocatively in a New
England Journal of Medicine guest editorial in the fall of
2012 entitled Whats Preventing Us from Preventing Type
II Diabetes?36 where it is shown that we know how to
prevent a large proportion of the illness on which we are
spending $750 billion per year in the US - it would basically
require lifestyle coaching in diet and exercise - and yet we do
not do it.
It may well take a grass roots epigenetics/lifestyle medicine
revolution to shake off the worsening health trends we are
facing in the setting of a progressively sicker and more
endangered planet. In order to improve our diet, reduce
toxins, allergens and infection, reduce stress and increase
exercise and sleep and better nurture each other, we not only
need to make healthy personal choices but aggregate these
together to make healthier social and planetary choices. Let
everyday epigenetics inform science of what is possible so
that we can respond on an appropriate scale to the magnitude
of the crisis we are facing.
32. Fradkin JE, Roberts BT, Rodgers GP. What's preventing us from preventing type 2 diabetes? N Engl J Med. 2012;367(13):1177-1179.
PUBLIC HEALTH AND LIFESTYLE EPIGENETICS CAN BE IMPLEMENTED NOW
At present we already know enough to improve the everyday
epigenetics of vast numbers of people. The problem here is
not scientific but economic and political. While targeted
epigenetic treatments may emerge in the future, and while
some of them may turn out to be benign, we do not have to
sit on our hands doing nothing while we wait for these
clinical trials to proceed (and often fail). For myriad reasons
a concerted attempt to improve the baseline everyday
epigenetics of the general population, and particularly the at
risk populations, is a path that we need to take as soon as
possible to reduce the comorbidity patterns and suffering we
are facing in autism spectrum disorder as well as many other
severe health conditions such as diabetes and obesity where
very similar considerations apply. The political and
economic programs are spelled out provocatively in a New
England Journal of Medicine guest editorial in the fall of
2012 entitled Whats Preventing Us from Preventing Type
II Diabetes?36 where it is shown that we know how to
prevent a large proportion of the illness on which we are
spending $750 billion per year in the US - it would basically
require lifestyle coaching in diet and exercise - and yet we do
not do it.
It may well take a grass roots epigenetics/lifestyle medicine
revolution to shake off the worsening health trends we are
facing in the setting of a progressively sicker and more
endangered planet. In order to improve our diet, reduce
toxins, allergens and infection, reduce stress and increase
exercise and sleep and better nurture each other, we not only
need to make healthy personal choices but aggregate these
together to make healthier social and planetary choices. Let
everyday epigenetics inform science of what is possible so
that we can respond on an appropriate scale to the magnitude
of the crisis we are facing.
32. Fradkin JE, Roberts BT, Rodgers GP. What's preventing us from preventing type 2 diabetes? N Engl J Med. 2012;367(13):1177-1179.
[center][/center]
http://www.ewg.org/research/ewgs-dietary-guidelines
http://www.ewg.org/foodnews/summary.php
http://drhyman.com/blog/2015/05/21/eat-healthy-on-a-budget-with-these-strategies/
http://robynobrien.com/real-people-real-budgets-can-afford-organic-food/
http://foodbabe.com/2013/05/20/how-to-eat-organic-on-a-budget/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
181 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Altered Genes, Twisted Truth: How the Venture to Genetically Engineer Our Food Has Subverted Science [View all]
nationalize the fed
Mar 2016
OP
There is a vast difference between plant breeding and gene splicing / genetic modification (GMOs).
PufPuf23
Mar 2016
#8
They also have genetic traits that prevent natural birth, and cause discomfort
immoderate
Mar 2016
#87
I am not aware of any place that has counteracted Vitamin A deficiencies with Golden Rice.
immoderate
Mar 2016
#105
You don't know about science. Stop speaking for it. Stop invoking ghosts. You don't know me.
immoderate
Mar 2016
#131
Can't even watch a video, eh? Your facts are in error or very misleading and cause me to ask who is
Kip Humphrey
Mar 2016
#66
"What would it take to change your position?" I'll start when my botonist wife informs me otherwise.
Kip Humphrey
Mar 2016
#72
Many university research is now either fully or partially funded by the industry who whants the
Dont call me Shirley
Mar 2016
#109
Long term animal feeding studies, the gold standard for demonstrating safety, do not exist.
proverbialwisdom
Mar 2016
#41
Check search engine at homepage of http://www.gmwatch.org/ for objective vetting of research/news.
proverbialwisdom
Mar 2016
#64
“Generation Rx” - it's all a big mystery. Food allergies affect 1 in 13 children in the US...
proverbialwisdom
Mar 2016
#97
Study suggests potential association between "soy formula" & seizures in children w autism (3/13/14)
proverbialwisdom
Mar 2016
#112
True. However, enough is unknown currently to justify caution, IMO. You may decide differently.(nt)
proverbialwisdom
Mar 2016
#126
All you gmo defenders can eat all the gmos you want, many of us make a choice not to. We have the
Dont call me Shirley
Mar 2016
#9
There are zero credible studies that show anything harmful or any adverse health effects
True Earthling
Mar 2016
#10
Don't blame GMO's...blame cigarettes, alcohol, poor diet & lack of exercise etc
True Earthling
Mar 2016
#15
Everyone knows that ingestion of cheese can lead to restless sleep. Especially, if the cheese...
yawnmaster
Mar 2016
#20
You are very wise to take those precautions if you are going to keep eating cheese. eom
yawnmaster
Mar 2016
#73
When you keep posting autism links, that is more than advocating for the Precautionary Principle.
progressoid
Mar 2016
#25
True, it's implicit: "...eat high nutrient density food; avoid junk food, allergens, toxicants..."
proverbialwisdom
Mar 2016
#161
FOOD ALLERGIES are sufficient. Pivot away from the rest if you choose not to be ahead of the curve.
proverbialwisdom
Mar 2016
#174
National Acad of Sciences: "genetic transformation has potential to produce unanticipated allergens"
proverbialwisdom
Mar 2016
#176
Just saw this -> 3/8/16: "USDA Called Out by 50 Groups for Censoring Science"
proverbialwisdom
Mar 2016
#179
Here's how retiring NVICP Special Master Denise K. Vowell stated it in Wright v HHS - 9/21/15 (ii).
proverbialwisdom
Mar 2016
#65
The feed lot studies you cite are not scientific. Those animals are raised on antibiotics.
immoderate
Mar 2016
#62
We al have the RIGHT TO KNOW how our food is grown, what is in it, what animals are fed, what
Dont call me Shirley
Mar 2016
#106
Why don't Druker and his buddies at the Maharishi Institute just meditate this problem away.
progressoid
Mar 2016
#17
Are the health outcomes comparable? Paraphrasing Springsteen,"It's hard to be a saint in the city."
proverbialwisdom
Mar 2016
#178
Sure, because the one sided book you keep harping on is the end all on the subject
Major Nikon
Mar 2016
#81
I'm merely observing that horde of "critics" on this thread has not read the book
AxionExcel
Mar 2016
#115
The OP specified the timeframe, and we sure see a nice drop after the 1990s too...
whatthehey
Mar 2016
#148
Either you are not understanding what I wrote or you are confused. Also see posts #3 and #8 above.
PufPuf23
Mar 2016
#158
When the usual suspects all say those who disagree are part of the conspiracy
Major Nikon
Mar 2016
#99
Top experts (Herbert, Mumper) recommend "a whole food diet that is as organic as possible."
proverbialwisdom
Mar 2016
#129
This is wrong - "GMOs aren't fundamentally different from traditional plant breeding"
PufPuf23
Mar 2016
#149
The fact that the poster doesn't know the reality about that "study" is astounding.
HuckleB
Mar 2016
#173