Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

gwheezie

(3,580 posts)
18. My delusional plan for healthcare is multi faceted
Fri Mar 11, 2016, 10:58 PM
Mar 2016

1st I believe mcare for all would be a good start but in order to improve actual health care, we need to train more providers which I think can nicely tie into college tuition. We do currently have a program that pays for doctors, nurse practitioners and physicians assistant who contract to work in under served areas. Most are rural. That kind of program should be greatly expanded. Mcare also does not pay for essential care like dental and vision. There are so many limitations on criteria for outpatient services. Also including in a mcare for all program would be expansion into many more clinics. Increase in home care services. Available services in public places, like schools, libraries, post offices, bus stations, employers I could go on.
You seem to want to have an argument about payment and cost, I am focused on actual health care. That is where the cost will decrease by decreasing the number of sick people. But that is a side benefit, the real benefit is to society.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Health Care vs Health Insurance [View all] litlbilly Mar 2016 OP
Insurance is how France and Germany do it. They have the best and most effacacious HC. Mika Mar 2016 #1
exactly, they are not regulated when they write the rules. You are correct, if we did it that way, litlbilly Mar 2016 #2
I hear ya, but a more refined view is needed, imo. Mika Mar 2016 #12
Medicare is a form of health insurance. And one that only pays part... PoliticAverse Mar 2016 #3
true but its not based on pure profit. That's the difference litlbilly Mar 2016 #5
That ignores the huge amount of not-for-profit insurers like most of Blue Cross Recursion Mar 2016 #17
You got it right! Rider3 Mar 2016 #4
*If* they decide not to? scscholar Mar 2016 #6
the insurance companies job, deny health care. that's how they make more money. litlbilly Mar 2016 #7
you notice he uses the rw meme, suplimental like medicare advantage. they name it litlbilly Mar 2016 #8
Medicare is insurance gwheezie Mar 2016 #9
IT IS NOT FOR PROFIT. GOT IT? litlbilly Mar 2016 #10
why dont you just come out and say you love Hills plan over Bernie's, i know thats where your going litlbilly Mar 2016 #11
I don't like either plan gwheezie Mar 2016 #13
right now we spend 20 tril on hc, Bernies plan costs 11tril, do the math litlbilly Mar 2016 #14
you only read and care about the cost, never hear of the savings. i wonder why that is? litlbilly Mar 2016 #15
My delusional plan for healthcare is multi faceted gwheezie Mar 2016 #18
+10,000,000,000, gwheezie! Dont call me Shirley Mar 2016 #20
Lots of private insurance is not for profit too Recursion Mar 2016 #16
For profit health insurance and health care are a fucking disaster! Dont call me Shirley Mar 2016 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Health Care vs Health Ins...»Reply #18