Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,704 posts)
12. I am defending everybody's right to free speech.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 08:50 AM
Mar 2016

My old man contacted malaria and was blinded in one eye during the North African Campaign in WW ll to protect that right.


That's the point of free speech. TreasonousBastard Mar 2016 #1
Free speech doesn't extend to yelling fire in a crowded theater or inciting a riot EmperorHasNoClothes Mar 2016 #2
That's the holding of Brandenburg V Ohio. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #31
UNCOMFORTABLE?? annabanana Mar 2016 #60
HE'S TELLING PPL AT HIS RALLIES TO BEAT UP PROTESTORS MuttLikeMe Mar 2016 #64
So... Telling his supporters to beat up protesters is merely "making us uncomfortable"? EmperorHasNoClothes Mar 2016 #66
Until they do and they did malaise Mar 2016 #97
And the point is rock Mar 2016 #94
You're seriously wrong about that. Donald Ian Rankin Mar 2016 #98
The protestors do and they have a right to not be punched in the face underpants Mar 2016 #3
BTW, the person who punched the protestor at the Trump event was arrested. n/t PoliticAverse Mar 2016 #6
Yeah I know underpants Mar 2016 #14
. . . . eventually, after the clip went viral. . .n/t annabanana Mar 2016 #61
Exactly - without the video & intervention from the outside world noamnety Mar 2016 #76
yep marions ghost Mar 2016 #111
Only because video was released... awoke_in_2003 Mar 2016 #148
Anti-Trump protestors don't have a right to be violent. WinkyDink Mar 2016 #89
Were they in Chicago? They haven't been anywhere else underpants Mar 2016 #118
No angels on either side. But without the protestors would there have been any violence? WinkyDink Mar 2016 #129
Blaming the victims ? underpants Mar 2016 #141
So do protestors. octoberlib Mar 2016 #4
+1 daleanime Mar 2016 #62
I agree, but protestors don't always "peaceably assemble." Anyway, lest we forget: WinkyDink Mar 2016 #91
Sure, and others have the right of free speech to disrupt and shout him down. Chan790 Mar 2016 #5
Actually you don't have a right to disrupt and shout-down someone at their event. PoliticAverse Mar 2016 #7
It's not illegal. Chan790 Mar 2016 #16
Well "civil disobedience" can be effective even if it is illegal. Whether one can be removed... PoliticAverse Mar 2016 #29
but they aren't being removed for what they said treestar Mar 2016 #18
Would you have the same response if right wingers disrupted a Sanders rally in a similar way? oberliner Mar 2016 #17
I would think so treestar Mar 2016 #19
Yup. Chan790 Mar 2016 #20
I think candidates for president should be allowed to give speeches oberliner Mar 2016 #25
You're in favor of bushco 'free speech zones', aren't you? Ick. X_Digger Mar 2016 #83
I had exactly the same reaction. thank you. berningman Mar 2016 #88
No, of course not oberliner Mar 2016 #90
Have fun walking it back. We saw it. n/t X_Digger Mar 2016 #107
Why are you suddenly so concerned about Trumps right to free speech? tularetom Mar 2016 #8
I am defending everybody's right to free speech. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #12
Protesters were exercising their free speech. HooptieWagon Mar 2016 #123
I would defend anybody's right to be heard. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #127
And who makes the decision as to who has the right, who does not and pampango Mar 2016 #9
He has the right to say all of that Chemisse Mar 2016 #11
T-rump will probably become stronger among his supporters as more of hero Iliyah Mar 2016 #26
what would it be like if marions ghost Mar 2016 #125
His sentiments are odious and will be rejected in the marketplace of ideas. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #15
Trump gets heard more than anyone else anywhere Enrique Mar 2016 #10
Yes. peacebird Mar 2016 #13
Not on D.U. --- if your posts criticize St. Hillary the Annointed, you get hidden. Hoppy Mar 2016 #21
No they don't leftofcool Mar 2016 #24
Wow - this is preposterous oberliner Mar 2016 #35
Sure he does. So do the protestors. Glitterati Mar 2016 #22
Points DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #28
Yes. treestar Mar 2016 #23
Yes they do. leftofcool Mar 2016 #27
Yes, and we have the right to protest against those incipient fascists. DCBob Mar 2016 #30
Shutting down political rallies is OK? oberliner Mar 2016 #37
Yes, yes, and yes Glitterati Mar 2016 #40
False choice oberliner Mar 2016 #42
No, it's not. Glitterati Mar 2016 #49
Obviously it is oberliner Mar 2016 #51
Tsk, tsk, tsk, behave nicely children Glitterati Mar 2016 #53
Trump will not be president. The better angels of the American people will prevent that. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #58
Bwahahahahahaha! Glitterati Mar 2016 #59
Yeah, my old man was awarded a Purple Heart for being blinded in one eye and contacting malaria... DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #63
Then you need to wake the hell up and recognize this little Hitler Glitterati Mar 2016 #65
The people will reject him at the ballot box. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #67
And, in the meantime, continue to call him out Glitterati Mar 2016 #70
I don't think I am one of the TSK, TSK ers... DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #72
Yet, throughout this thread you've done EXACTLY that Glitterati Mar 2016 #73
You do not grasp in the slightest what American democracy is about. Trump has legitimately won WinkyDink Mar 2016 #109
Wow, amazing Glitterati Mar 2016 #110
Agree and disagree. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #55
Bullshit! You cannot know that. More tsk, tsk, tsk, behave children Glitterati Mar 2016 #56
Um, shutting down political rallies IS Fascist. And you raise a false comparison. Chicago was a WinkyDink Mar 2016 #102
Chickenshit Trump shut it down, NOT THE PROTESTORS Glitterati Mar 2016 #105
Do you not even read what you post? "Yes, yes, yes" to the question "Shutting down political rallies WinkyDink Mar 2016 #108
I know exactly what I said Glitterati Mar 2016 #113
Then your above reply to me is a non sequitur. WinkyDink Mar 2016 #115
That's where the balance will/should come in. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #41
In this case yes. DCBob Mar 2016 #43
Make the case without preventing him from speaking at his own events oberliner Mar 2016 #45
There is no defending this lunatic. DCBob Mar 2016 #46
Agreed oberliner Mar 2016 #52
I can see both sides of the argument... DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #69
Damn right it is MuttLikeMe Mar 2016 #71
Undercover Nazi rallies? oberliner Mar 2016 #92
Thank you! No one wants to seem to give Trump a platform for him to get his message out FlatBaroque Mar 2016 #32
oh I get it now Enrique Mar 2016 #33
Not everything needs to be viewed through a Bernie v. Hillary prism oberliner Mar 2016 #38
of course not Enrique Mar 2016 #95
Free speech means the government can't shut you up or arrest you. It has nothing to do with private m-lekktor Mar 2016 #34
I'm always hearing on the DU about MLK Iliyah Mar 2016 #36
Trump has a right to speak, people have a right to protest. JFKDem62 Mar 2016 #39
From a purely partisan perspective it's great. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #44
Trump is treating America like his own reality TV show. JFKDem62 Mar 2016 #47
His devotees will love it but most Americans don't want four or eight years of chaos./nt DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #50
You seriously underestimate the stupidity of the American ppl MuttLikeMe Mar 2016 #74
No and no. I just question their numbers... DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #75
Trump decided not to speak awake Mar 2016 #48
+1 DCBob Mar 2016 #93
first amend ment artyteacher Mar 2016 #54
Trump canceled his own rally: his speech his choice alcibiades_mystery Mar 2016 #57
That's what he claims but it was CPD and the Secret Service who shut it down elehhhhna Mar 2016 #78
CPD shut it down? alcibiades_mystery Mar 2016 #81
CPD did NOT do so. It was chickenshit Trump Glitterati Mar 2016 #86
That's what I thought...In was responding to this previous poster who said CPD shut it down alcibiades_mystery Mar 2016 #96
I can't turn on my tv or go online w/o hearing this windbag... lame54 Mar 2016 #68
^^this^^ salinsky Mar 2016 #80
What a total crock. Do you think we should have a limit to our speech? WinkyDink Mar 2016 #101
we already do... lame54 Mar 2016 #106
No, you weren't speaking of "fire, theatre," blah blah. You were speaking of TIME and AMOUNT. WinkyDink Mar 2016 #112
I'm completely lost... lame54 Mar 2016 #122
"He has more speech than any of us." What is "more speech" to mean, in a democracy? Are there WinkyDink Mar 2016 #133
then take a nap... lame54 Mar 2016 #145
Everyone should, but there's always been that human impulse to shut people up Hydra Mar 2016 #77
Free speech includes inciting and encouraging violence? noiretextatique Mar 2016 #79
This is not a Free Speech issue. We are past that. IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #82
I can't beleive how stunningly anti-democracy this post is. Do you think your attitude looks good on WinkyDink Mar 2016 #100
If Bernie Sanders starts spewing Anti-American hate speech, IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #130
Conservatives have spoken enough Matrosov Mar 2016 #84
That's pretty darn Fascist. WinkyDink Mar 2016 #99
Protesters do not impede free speech CoffeeCat Mar 2016 #85
Yes. Everything short of the delineated "incitement to riot". WinkyDink Mar 2016 #87
I'd rather know what they are thinking. raging moderate Mar 2016 #103
I don't agree with it. vdogg Mar 2016 #104
Trump called it off because of the violence and potential for more. And that prudence makes him a WinkyDink Mar 2016 #114
Are...are you defending Trump? vdogg Mar 2016 #147
As long as the Government does not try to suppress his speech his Right is intact. TalkingDog Mar 2016 #116
"Messy"? Is that you, Donald "Democracy is messy" Rumsfeld? Man, when we start parroting Right- WinkyDink Mar 2016 #119
Give me a list of allowed words (ironic that) and I'll dutifully toe the line. TalkingDog Mar 2016 #126
It was famously uttered by Rummy; sorry you don't remember. You want IRONY? READ THIS THREAD. WinkyDink Mar 2016 #138
Execpt for hyperspecific words you personally find obejctionable. TalkingDog Mar 2016 #139
And the expected *crickets* TalkingDog Mar 2016 #144
The problem with the OP query is the clairvoyant assumption of the words "incipient Fascist." WinkyDink Mar 2016 #117
The Government didn't shut down his free speech. HooptieWagon Mar 2016 #120
There is always an exception to the rule. Lint Head Mar 2016 #121
THERE IS NO EXCEPTION TO THE RULE OF POLITICAL FREE SPEECH HERE. WinkyDink Mar 2016 #124
There are exceptions. Lint Head Mar 2016 #134
Agree but I'm going to go dark JustAnotherGen Mar 2016 #128
Yep. This is why we must endure the likes of Rush Limbaugh on the radio. Cleita Mar 2016 #131
I don't see this as a 1st amendment issue gwheezie Mar 2016 #132
See, the problem is the word "confront." WinkyDink Mar 2016 #136
For once, in a long time, I agree with you. aikoaiko Mar 2016 #135
Yes. Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #137
I am matrilineally Jewish... DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #140
Exactly! Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #142
It does make Trump look like the chaos candidate and that's good for us... DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #143
why is this even a question? Macattack1 Mar 2016 #146
Of course liberalfromaustin21 Mar 2016 #149
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Do even the most odious a...»Reply #12