Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Quixote1818

(31,148 posts)
1. Researchers found similar results with Rats eating saccharine but eventually determined
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 11:07 PM
Mar 2016

the cancer effects on rats did not occur in humans. So cancer in rats may or may not mean cancer in humans.

What does an increase of <.05 mean anyway? Is that 5%? The risk of getting Lukeman is 1.5%. As Sci-Show points out if you eat processed meat your risk of rectal cancer goes from about 5% to about 5.8%. An increase of 18% of your original risk. So if our risk of getting leukemia is only 1.5% and we are increasing that risk by around 5% then by drinking Splenda (if it actually does increase cancer risk in humans) would go from 1.50% to something like 1.51%

Correct me if I messed up the math as math is not a strong point for me. My calculator says 5% of 1.5 = .00075



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Splenda ingredient, sucra...»Reply #1