Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

proverbialwisdom

(4,959 posts)
6. EFF: "Worried about Apple? California Has a Bill That Would Disable Encryption on All Phones"
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 04:45 PM
Mar 2016

Last edited Sun Mar 13, 2016, 05:21 PM - Edit history (1)

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/03/worried-about-apple-california-has-bill-would-disable-encryption-all-phones

March 9, 2016 | By Andrew Crocker
Worried about Apple? California Has a Bill That Would Disable Encryption on All Phones


Smartphone users in California take notice: a new CA State Assembly bill would ban default encryption features on all smartphones. Assembly Bill 1681, introduced in January by Assemblymember Jim Cooper (D), would require any smartphone sold in California “to be capable of being decrypted and unlocked by its manufacturer or its operating system provider.” This is perhaps even more drastic than the legal precedent at stake in Apple’s ongoing showdown with the Justice Department, in which the government is trying to force a private company to write code undermining key security features in specific cases.

Both Apple and Google currently encrypt smartphones running their iOS and Android operating systems by default. A.B. 1681 would undo this default, penalizing manufacturers and providers of operating systems $2,500 per device that cannot be decrypted at the time of sale.

Similar proposals have been made by Manhattan district attorney Cyrus Vance Jr., who published a white paper [pdf] in November 2015 arguing that law enforcement needs to access the contents of smartphones to solve a range of crimes. A nearly identical bill is also pending in the New York State Assembly.

EFF opposes A.B. 1681 and all other state proposals to regulate smartphone encryption because they are terrible policy. If passed, A.B. 1681 would leave law-abiding Californians at risk for identity theft, data breach, stalking, and other invasions of privacy, with little benefit to law enforcement. It would be both ineffective and impossible to enforce. And, if that weren’t enough, it suffers from serious constitutional infirmities.

Meanwhile, in the U.S. Congress, Representative Ted Lieu has introduced H.R. 4528, the ENCRYPT Act, which would definitively preempt state bills like A.B. 1681. EFF agrees this is the right approach to state legislation in this area, although we’d like H.R. 4528 to go further and also prevent Congress and the rest of the federal government from undermining encryption.

<>

http://asmdc.org/members/a09/news-room/press-releases/cooper-appointed-to-key-leadership-position

Cooper Appointed to Key Leadership Position
Created: Thursday, 10 March 2016 11:51


SACRAMENTO – Today, Assemblymember Jim Cooper (D-Elk Grove) was appointed by Speaker Anthony Rendon to serve as Assistant Majority Floor Leader as part of the Speaker’s new leadership team.

“I want to thank Speaker Rendon for appointing me to his leadership team,” said Cooper “I am honored to be chosen to serve as Assistant Majority Floor Leader during a new era in the State Assembly. I look forward to continuing to work with Speaker Rendon and our members to make California a better place to live, work, and raise a family.”

Assemblymember Cooper represents the Cities of Sacramento, Elk Grove, Galt, and Lodi.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I don't know what they expect to find on my phone about my taxes. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2016 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author DUbeornot2be Mar 2016 #3
Authoritarians always want to try to find 'reasonable' excuses to take away rights, especially Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2016 #4
he is saying the govt is going to spy on its citizen to enforce the "law" in general questionseverything Mar 2016 #2
GOTTA believe this framing designed to peel away Repubs on the phone issue Land Shark Mar 2016 #5
EFF: "Worried about Apple? California Has a Bill That Would Disable Encryption on All Phones" proverbialwisdom Mar 2016 #6
California is a joke of a state. Borderline authoritarian. LittleBlue Mar 2016 #8
Probably catch a lot of Pimps and not too street-smart drug dealers. PeoViejo Mar 2016 #7
it doesnt matter. Pretty much every "special extraordinary crime fighting tool" ends up being used Warren DeMontague Mar 2016 #9
And he said 'with a warrant'. Why would you think phones are somehow 'special'? randome Mar 2016 #10
Problem is warrants seem to be handed out like candy these days davidn3600 Mar 2016 #12
Sounds like Obama is trying to define when a phone can be searched. Isn't that a good thing? randome Mar 2016 #14
Congress is on Big Brother's side davidn3600 Mar 2016 #15
no where in the article is "warrant" mentioned questionseverything Mar 2016 #20
Seems like the article didn't include his full quote. randome Mar 2016 #22
much better article here questionseverything Mar 2016 #23
And that's something to be concerned about. Really. randome Mar 2016 #25
they are openly admitting warrants not required...from the article questionseverything Mar 2016 #36
Because if someone can unlock it (Apple, NSA, Police) then anyone can unlock it when I have done.... Logical Mar 2016 #24
That's not what the FBI is asking for. They just want this one phone unlocked. randome Mar 2016 #27
And you see this not as a dangerous precedent when it comes to stripping of privacy protections? Ed Suspicious Mar 2016 #28
I honestly don't see the difference between a phone and a ledger full of names & bribes. randome Mar 2016 #31
You and I disagree what common sense means. Apple should make it so NO ONE can unlock the phone..... Logical Mar 2016 #33
Then that means child pornographers are safe (yes, I know it's an overused trope but...) randome Mar 2016 #35
that is only part of the problem. Once a backdoor exists it can be exploited. Warren Stupidity Mar 2016 #19
He said don't take an absolutist view treestar Mar 2016 #11
I predict they will catch a lot more pot smokers than terrorists. Profit prisons need love too Doctor_J Mar 2016 #13
the whole thing is so basically anyone can be arrested at any time questionseverything Mar 2016 #21
Yes. Ed Suspicious Mar 2016 #29
All the authoritarians want a gummint key to your data. Warren Stupidity Mar 2016 #16
I hope getting it involves getting a subpoena first lunatica Mar 2016 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author randome Mar 2016 #18
Were they not teaching the 4th Amendment during the years Obama was undertaking Constitutional... villager Mar 2016 #26
The 4th is a lot more annoying when you are on the side that wants to disregard it. Ed Suspicious Mar 2016 #30
"A policeman's job is only easy in a police-state". n/t PoliticAverse Mar 2016 #32
How about not passing a $400 billion corporate tax forgiveness bill? liberal_at_heart Mar 2016 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...»Reply #6