Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
9. IF he could succeed. In more mundane terms,
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 09:51 AM
Mar 2016

IMO, Kaisich could be considered the most dangerous. He's theoretically a lot more electable and satisfactory to ultraconservative billionaires and pretends to be more moderate, but he has authoritarian leanings judging by his history and would continue the transfer of power and wealth to the few; and, judging by the reelection of W he would probably have a full 8 years to stack SCOTUS with justices who would continue the nation's march backwards and to the right for another 30 years or more.

So IMO, theoretically most dangerous but unelectible and hamstrung by the Constitution anyway, Cruz, then Trump.

Most realistically dangerous, Kaisich, followed by Rubio for the same reason.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Donald Trump Poses an Unp...»Reply #9