Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)The Woman Who Could SPOIL WISCONSIN [View all]

Kathy Nickolaus (Credit: AP/Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel/Michael Sears)
Kathy Nickolaus is the nation's most notorious election clerk -- and Dems worry that she's out to help Scott Walker
" For months, progressives have raised the alarm over what role Kathy Nickolaus, the nations most notorious county election clerk, would play in counting tonights Wisconsin recall results. Their fears were echoed by the pro-Walker Editorial Board of the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, which wrote in April that Waukesha Countys voting snafus on her watch had damaged her offices credibility beyond repair.
In a closely-watched judicial election in April 2011 seen as a referendum on Scott Walkers agenda a seeming Democratic victory evaporated when Nickolaus announced shed found 14,000 misplaced ballots from her deep-red county two days after the election. In Aprils GOP presidential primary, issues with Waukesha Countys election computer system led to more delayed results, as paper voting slips were gathered from across the county and put up on the walls of an office to be counted. This morning, the county executive offices chief of staff told the Washington Posts Greg Sargent that Nicklaus will not be involved in the vote counting this evening, but that she could be in the office anyway. Some say thats not good enough.
As Sargent notes, similar assurances were given a month ago for the recall primaries. But a TV news station caught Nickolaus present in the office, and appearing to be very much in charge of the count. An anonymous observer told Mother Jones Andy Kroll that Nickolaus was there, and she made it seem as if she was in control. Republican Waukesha County Executive Dan Vrakas told the Waukesha Freeman that vote counts were being handled by a deputy clerk, and that Id prefer that she wasnt here on election night but I cant ban her from the building anymore than I can ban anyone else from the building. Nickolaus and Vrakas did not return requests for comment this morning.
Reached over e-mail, We Are Wisconsin spokesperson Kelly Steele said, Despite the dog-and-pony show in Waukesha County suggesting shes stepped aside all evidence except her own word points to her remaining firmly in control of the most controversial jurisdiction in Wisconsin, which just happens to be the heart and soul of Scott Walkers base.
cont'
http://www.salon.com/2012/06/05/the_woman_who_could_spoil_wisconsin/singleton/
.
25 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Right! Even if she is successful, if our numbers are through the roof in Dane, that's all she wrote.
Liberal_Stalwart71
Jun 2012
#4
This story has factual errors & omits the fact that we have hundreds of eyes on every polling place
PeaceNikki
Jun 2012
#6
I never said there's no chance. Ever. If I thought that I wouldn't BE OBSERVING, FFS!!
PeaceNikki
Jun 2012
#8
And I think it's shitty to dismiss all of the work people on the ground are doing.
PeaceNikki
Jun 2012
#16
Waukesha Stonewall: Officials Refuse to Say Who’s In Charge of Monitoring Elections, Counting Result
We Want Peace
Jun 2012
#7
US elections are so fucked-up that independent oversight agencies are pretty much useless
Scootaloo
Jun 2012
#15
Isn't DOJ monitoring this election - I hope they have a camera on her all day/night. nt
TBF
Jun 2012
#19
Sooner or later she will over reach. They always do. Their power goes to their heads. nm
rhett o rick
Jun 2012
#21