Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
12. No it is not.
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 09:42 AM
Mar 2016

While the right wingers are skewering each other, we should sit back and watch (and applaud). I see no reason whatsoever to defend Kelly.

If Trump turns his sights on someone, either a non-political person or someone on our side, then we let him have it with both barrels. We can then point to Kelly as a further example of why he's such an oaf.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

There is something seriously wrong with him. madaboutharry Mar 2016 #1
Who cares about Megyn Kelly? BillZBubb Mar 2016 #2
It's not about Megyn Kelly in particular; it's about The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2016 #3
+ 1 JoePhilly Mar 2016 #4
Exactly! Quackers Mar 2016 #5
ditto to this sister, or brother. Wrong is wrong. eom a kennedy Mar 2016 #6
+1 tammywammy Mar 2016 #8
Let me get this right. ZX86 Mar 2016 #9
So it's OK because "they asked for it." The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2016 #10
Asked for it? ZX86 Mar 2016 #11
Megyn Kelly today herding cats Mar 2016 #7
No it is not. BillZBubb Mar 2016 #12
First, he came for Megyn Kelly. I did not speak up because I was not a Fox News viewer. Tommy_Carcetti Mar 2016 #15
Oh please! Over the top much? BillZBubb Mar 2016 #16
You're letting bad behavior stand. Tommy_Carcetti Mar 2016 #18
Kelly is handling this well. Refuses to engage. mainer Mar 2016 #13
Miss "Santa is White" ZX86 Mar 2016 #14
Yeah, sure, whatever... BillZBubb Mar 2016 #17
Vanity Fair article about her mainer Mar 2016 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump now in the tenth gr...»Reply #12