Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

21st Century Poet

(255 posts)
28. President Obama is doing his duty.
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 09:08 AM
Mar 2016

The Constitution says that the President has to appoint judges to the Supreme Court in consultation with the Senate. The Constitution does not make exceptions for when Senate members happen to be assholes. Appointing a liberal judge would have been the right thing to do if Democrats had been elected as a majority to the Senate. The people chose otherwise so the President's choice has to reflect the situation of a Democratic President and a Republican majority Senate.

I know that this is not what the Democratic base likes to hear but that's the way it is. You have the Constitution, the President and the Senate all playing a role in this. These institutions and people's democratic choices are what run the country and not the Democratic base.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This is more informative than one of Cenk's spasmodic rants BeyondGeography Mar 2016 #1
Yep! Chasstev365 Mar 2016 #2
It isn't a "bluff" Cosmocat Mar 2016 #9
I wish DC's Democrats feared their base. Scuba Mar 2016 #15
Like the government zentrum Mar 2016 #31
They do fear their base. -none Mar 2016 #42
Maybe not "now" but some at least have let it be known truebluegreen Mar 2016 #64
BHO picked two very solid progressives Cosmocat Mar 2016 #68
He did--but I was speaking of this seat, truebluegreen Mar 2016 #71
As was I Cosmocat Mar 2016 #74
"duh" on what the Rs will allow. truebluegreen Mar 2016 #81
President Obama is doing his duty. 21st Century Poet Mar 2016 #28
Realpolitic...it's real. Surya Gayatri Mar 2016 #35
Senate is to oppose an appointment ONLY if there are obvious or unusual Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #52
Based on what? The Senate can advise and consent however they want. RAFisher Mar 2016 #70
Correct ... salinsky Mar 2016 #60
Can we all just STFU about umpteen dimensional chess? tularetom Mar 2016 #3
ahhh the chess thing.....whenever obama does something that makes me wanna puke dembotoz Mar 2016 #4
What you mock as "umpteen dimensional chess" is actually NYC Liberal Mar 2016 #11
So now you are calling our President a "brain dead moron"? Loki Mar 2016 #13
This Pick Is BS billhicks76 Mar 2016 #20
I didn't call President Obama a brain dead moron. Loki Mar 2016 #25
Whoever alerted for that should just hang it up. revbones Mar 2016 #78
iconically the post calling the 'brain dead moron' out was hidden by jury MariaThinks Mar 2016 #48
Another Bernie supporters thinks Obama is "a brain dead moron" itsrobert Mar 2016 #26
And Sanders supporters wonder why they are not appealing to the broad base of the Democratic Party Gothmog Mar 2016 #30
LOL messiah Mar 2016 #32
"People on this forum are mostly Republicans who defend conservative policies." BeyondGeography Mar 2016 #36
Such bitter, toxic, irrational hatred directed towards President Obama. nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #41
This isn't a chess move nomination. Cassiopeia Mar 2016 #5
Obama is the only one in this discussion who got elected to be POTUS redkwamya Mar 2016 #6
He may not matter. MisterFred Mar 2016 #7
Didnt Like What Bush Did Either billhicks76 Mar 2016 #19
... chervilant Mar 2016 #21
Everyone has opinions. Cassiopeia Mar 2016 #47
that's literally nonsense. geek tragedy Mar 2016 #53
They weighed in on NAFTA Cassiopeia Mar 2016 #56
that case was unanimous. Ruth Bader Ginsburg voted to uphold NAFTA nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #57
Exactly. blackspade Mar 2016 #8
No, it was the perfect choice for that reason Cosmocat Mar 2016 #10
Picking a viable liberal candidate would just ruin their chances of NYC Liberal Mar 2016 #12
IOW, permanently limit their careers BeyondGeography Mar 2016 #14
Funny how a week ago I was told to support Garland because President Obama A Simple Game Mar 2016 #23
I didn't tell you that. I said the same thing the day he was nominated. NYC Liberal Mar 2016 #29
That is a nonsensical arguement. blackspade Mar 2016 #18
A conservative would have green-lighted a lawsuit against the Abu Ghraib prison contractors? BeyondGeography Mar 2016 #22
I never said he wasn't a mixed bag. blackspade Mar 2016 #43
In truth, no one can credibly say they know how he would vote on CU BeyondGeography Mar 2016 #45
Well, I hope you are right. blackspade Mar 2016 #61
What part dont you get Cosmocat Mar 2016 #67
I don't 'get' that part because it is an assumption based on no data. blackspade Mar 2016 #69
So Cosmocat Mar 2016 #73
My data comes from previous standoffs w/Obama blackspade Mar 2016 #75
Which is a LOT smaller sample size Cosmocat Mar 2016 #79
Well, you are entitled to your opinion. blackspade Mar 2016 #80
the Republicans are the ones not allowing him to get a hearing nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #54
They will. blackspade Mar 2016 #62
how is Merrick Garland--who clerked for William Brennan--a "great" choice geek tragedy Mar 2016 #63
Ask the GOP blackspade Mar 2016 #65
Garland's nomination is another example of why we don't need another status quo President. Scuba Mar 2016 #16
I'm continually amazed at Obama's RepubliCON like behavior fasttense Mar 2016 #17
kick imagine2015 Mar 2016 #24
In other words, no SCOTUS justice should ever be confirmed again, ever. onenote Mar 2016 #27
Perhaps it's just as well we wait until after the General Election gordyfl Mar 2016 #33
Cenk Uygur is a loud-mouthed, blowhard, windbag poseur. Surya Gayatri Mar 2016 #34
Agree.I can't even watch that blowhard.nt sufrommich Mar 2016 #37
I last tried to watch him on MSNBC and was glad when he was axed. Surya Gayatri Mar 2016 #38
The typical 'attack the messenger' response. blackspade Mar 2016 #44
Messenger, Shemessenger...he's just plain obnoxious, even when he's Surya Gayatri Mar 2016 #46
Well, sad day for you then. blackspade Mar 2016 #49
What ev...I suspect I'll do just fine without Cenk's daily screeds. Surya Gayatri Mar 2016 #51
This should not be surprising at all Red Knight Mar 2016 #39
Garland is a moderate liberal. He's a respected judge. I'll take that. DemocraticWing Mar 2016 #40
Moderate liberal? blackspade Mar 2016 #50
he clerked for William Brennan. nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #55
Which means what, exactly? blackspade Mar 2016 #59
K&R CharlotteVale Mar 2016 #58
he's perfectly fit to serve on the court, he just is not ideologically left enough La Lioness Priyanka Mar 2016 #66
If Antonin Scalia was ressurrected Aerows Mar 2016 #72
What is up with Cenk lately? OhZone Mar 2016 #76
Get used to the new normal.. sendero Mar 2016 #77
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Cenk Uygur rips Merrick G...»Reply #28