Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: K&R if you feel President Obama Richly Deserves to Be Re-elected!!! [View all]ixion
(29,528 posts)149. What will it take to get it through your head:
I'm advocating for NO PARTICULAR PARTY. I'm advocating for and an end to government corruption, complete transparency and accountability for those conducting the People's Business. I'm advocating for an end to power in politics, and a COMPLETE restoration of our civil rights defined in the Constitution and Bill of Rights. And I'll be damned if I'll support ANY politician who acts in any way contrary to these goals, irregardless of political affiliation.
For someone who claims not to be a hack, you sure do post like one.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
171 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
No, it's an expression of frustration that more than one in ten progressives feel
Betty Karlson
Dec 2011
#48
Suggestion - rename your subject line to "President Obama Richly Deserves to Be Re-elected"
Old and In the Way
Dec 2011
#8
Disagree. The next flame-baiting thread will just get recced up in a couple of days.
banned from Kos
Dec 2011
#10
Last I saw, the first "Dump Obama" thread had 150 recs; the second from BBI had about 60
Number23
Dec 2011
#110
K&R & Notice how few of these posters have a damn thing to say about not only very real LOST
patrice
Dec 2011
#9
Yes, I am starting to see evidence that a third party damages whatever cause it represents
Zalatix
Dec 2011
#17
So do primary challenges - see Kennedy/Carter - 1980. That really helped.....Reagan.
Old and In the Way
Dec 2011
#34
Will the continual anti-Obamism be permitted after the campaign begins in earnest?
MjolnirTime
Dec 2011
#15
with a bunch of people trying to game one another working for him, with an eye on the exits & an ear
patrice
Dec 2011
#24
Well K&R because I want Obama to win in 2012, but it's not that disturbing to me to have
gateley
Dec 2011
#23
That thread is not saying they want the republican to win, its saying to replace Obama
quinnox
Dec 2011
#26
The point is even if it won't happen that people should be able to talk about it
quinnox
Dec 2011
#28
Define 'attention junkie' in a way that includes my thread and excludes any you've made.
Zalatix
Dec 2011
#46
Yeah, it means you don't give a rat's ass about justice as long as it's your team in the WH
ixion
Dec 2011
#51
Your problem is not with Obama, it's with the money men who are holding him hostage.
Zalatix
Dec 2011
#52
I agree that there are puppet masters. However, Obama wanted the job, and got it.
ixion
Dec 2011
#61
I made a partisan comment in a place called Democratic Underground and shake your head in disgust?
JohnnyRingo
Dec 2011
#103
Okay... I'm going to put my partisanship aside for a bit and have a conversation with you.
JohnnyRingo
Dec 2011
#137
okay, the answer to your question is very plain and simple and requires no nuance.
ixion
Dec 2011
#138
Though I said I'd end the conversation, let me correct a misconception you have about me
JohnnyRingo
Dec 2011
#142
"You want world peace, I want to eat and live indoors." I believe the 'misconception' is
ixion
Dec 2011
#143
You can be 'sick' of it all you want. That doesn't change the truth, nor does it
ixion
Dec 2011
#146
Your central theme seems to coincide more with Ron Paul's Revolution that spawned the TP
JohnnyRingo
Dec 2011
#153
If you expand the definition of war criminal to include President Obama
arely staircase
Dec 2011
#156
precisely what war crime (specific statute, please) do you imagine the president has committed? nt
arely staircase
Dec 2011
#162
Again, what laws has he broken? You have acused the President of the United States of being a war
arely staircase
Dec 2011
#164
"Killing civilians is a war crime. Period." Really? Under what jurisdiction? Please cite
arely staircase
Dec 2011
#166
It's clear and simple. It's murder. It's a violation of International Law. It's a war crime.
ixion
Dec 2011
#170
K & R. It's ludicrous, and coming from a small minority of malcontents and disruptors.
Tarheel_Dem
Dec 2011
#68
I agree with you 100%. I think that we have to remind ourselves that change
tropicanarose
Dec 2011
#72
K&R....Hate does strange things to people....being angry is not an option at this point
Tippy
Dec 2011
#78
because there's not a dime's worth of difference between George Bush and Al Gore...
greenman3610
Dec 2011
#105